
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
34.2%Queens University
65.8%Ole Miss
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADOle Miss -5.2
PROJECTED TOTAL164.4
MODEL MONEYLINEOle Miss -192

Ole Miss
15-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 80
Projected Total164.4
Projected ScoreOle Miss 85
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index53
118.4Offensive Efficiency109.2
117.0Defensive Efficiency109.5
1.4Net Efficiency-0.3
0.1Strength of Schedule5.4
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.3
71.4Tempo69.5
56.6%Effective FG%50.6%
14.8%Turnover Rate14.0%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %28.0%
37.6%Free Throw Rate33.8%
0.9Average Margin-0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY65.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (118.4–109.2), net efficiency (1.4–-0.3), recent form (1.5–-2.3), shooting efficiency (56.6–50.6).
Ole Miss COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (53.0–51.7), defensive efficiency (109.5–117.0), strength of schedule (5.4–0.1).