Kent State

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.4%Kent State

89.6%Alabama

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama -13.5

PROJECTED TOTAL175.5

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -862

Alabama

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreKent State 81

Projected Total175.5

Projected ScoreAlabama 94

Team Comparison

Kent StateMetricAlabama

54.7MMH Power Index69.5

113.9Offensive Efficiency121.6

107.6Defensive Efficiency111.2

6.3Net Efficiency10.4

-0.1Strength of Schedule9.4

2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5

74.0Tempo74.7

53.0%Effective FG%54.9%

17.7%Turnover Rate13.0%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %32.1%

43.5%Free Throw Rate36.9%

4.7Average Margin7.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–54.7), offensive efficiency (121.6–113.9), net efficiency (10.4–6.3), strength of schedule (9.4–-0.1).

Kent State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–111.2), offensive rebounding (35.0–32.1), free throw rate (43.5–36.9).

Final

Kent State

54—81

Alabama

Alabama by 27 • 75.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Kent StateTEAM STATAlabama

21-75FG27-60

28.0%FG%45.0%

2-273PT9-35

7.0%3PT%26.0%

10-13FT18-35

77.0%FT%51.0%

40Rebounds60

16Offensive Rebounds20

5Assists14

11Turnovers19

7Steals8

2Blocks7

23Fouls15

Player Box Score

Kent State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
VonCameron Davis	Forward	31	4-15	0-6	1-2	5	1	1	0	9
Delrecco Gillespie	F	21	4-10	0-0	1-1	8	0	0	0	9
Marquis Barnett	Not Available	19	3-11	0-4	3-4	3	2	0	1	9
Jalen Sullinger	Guard	24	1-14	1-7	4-4	1	0	2	0	7
Jamal Sumlin	G	25	3-6	0-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	6
Cli'Ron Hornbeak	Center	22	3-6	0-0	0-0	9	0	0	0	6
Anthony Morales	Forward	19	2-10	1-7	0-0	6	0	0	1	5
Mike Bekelja	Guard	15	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	3	0	2
Cian Medley	G	17	0-1	0-0	1-2	1	1	1	0	1
Magnus Entenmann	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Donovan Hunter	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Mark Sears	Guard	26	4-9	2-6	6-8	2	2	2	0	16
Aden Holloway	G	20	5-11	3-8	0-2	3	2	3	0	13
Grant Nelson	Forward	22	4-5	0-1	1-5	14	0	1	2	9
Labaron Philon Jr.	G	21	4-9	1-5	0-1	1	5	0	0	9
Derrion Reid	F	19	2-4	0-0	5-7	6	1	2	1	9
Chris Youngblood	Guard	21	3-10	2-9	0-0	3	1	0	0	8
Clifford Omoruyi	Center	19	3-5	0-0	1-2	12	0	0	1	7
Jarin Stevenson	F	18	0-2	0-2	4-6	4	2	0	0	4
Houston Mallette	G	6	1-2	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Aiden Sherrell	F	11	1-2	0-1	0-2	0	0	0	1	2
Mouhamed Dioubate	F	15	0-1	0-1	1-2	8	1	0	2	1
Max Scharnowski	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

75.9Possessions75.9

71.1Offensive Efficiency106.7

106.7Defensive Efficiency71.1

-35.6Net Efficiency35.6

29.3%Effective FG%52.5%

33.3%True Shooting %52.9%

14.4%Turnover Rate25.1%

17.3%Free Throw Rate58.3%

36.0%3-Point Rate58.3%

0.45Assist / Turnover0.74

Game Summary

Alabama won by 27 points. The game played at approximately 75.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.