Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

6.0%Grambling

94.0%Cincinnati

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCincinnati -17.2

PROJECTED TOTAL140.3

MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -1567

Cincinnati

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 62

Projected Total140.3

Projected ScoreCincinnati 79

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricCincinnati

41.4MMH Power Index61.5

100.7Offensive Efficiency105.3

100.4Defensive Efficiency97.3

0.3Net Efficiency8.0

-5.7Strength of Schedule5.1

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4

69.9Tempo69.4

49.2%Effective FG%50.6%

20.9%Turnover Rate17.0%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

42.2%Free Throw Rate30.7%

0.2Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–41.4), offensive efficiency (105.3–100.7), defensive efficiency (97.3–100.4), net efficiency (8.0–0.3).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (42.2–30.7).

Final

Grambling

49—84

Cincinnati

Cincinnati by 35 • 62.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATCincinnati

17-50FG30-65

34.0%FG%46.0%

2-143PT9-32

14.0%3PT%28.0%

13-15FT15-20

87.0%FT%75.0%

30Rebounds42

10Offensive Rebounds18

10Assists17

16Turnovers6

4Steals9

3Blocks6

21Fouls15

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ernest Ross	Forward	35	4-9	0-1	8-9	4	3	0	0	16
Mikale Stevenson	G	36	5-14	0-3	1-2	6	7	2	0	11
Lou Hutchinson	G	30	3-8	2-6	0-0	1	0	1	0	8
P.J. Edwards	G	21	1-3	0-1	2-2	6	0	0	0	4
James Flippin	F	19	2-7	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Kintavious Dozier	G	14	1-4	0-1	2-2	1	0	0	0	4
Solomon Ray	Forward	18	1-3	0-0	0-0	5	0	1	2	2
Cbo Newton	G	17	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
PJ Eason	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Emeka Nnaji	Forward	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Cincinnati

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Aziz Bandaogo	Forward	21	5-6	0-0	5-6	6	1	0	1	15
Dillon Mitchell	F	25	6-9	0-1	1-1	7	0	3	1	13
Day Day Thomas	G	15	4-9	2-3	2-3	5	3	3	0	12
Tyler Betsey	F	20	3-8	2-7	1-1	4	0	0	0	9
Arrinten Page	F	14	3-3	1-1	2-4	6	0	0	1	9
Jizzle James	G	30	3-9	1-6	0-0	4	8	2	1	7
Simas Lukosius	Guard	25	2-7	1-6	2-2	1	1	0	0	7
Dan Skillings Jr.	G	23	3-10	1-5	0-0	4	3	0	2	7
CJ Fredrick Jr.	Guard	12	1-2	1-2	0-1	1	1	0	0	3
Halvine Dzellat	C	5	0-1	0-0	2-2	1	0	1	0	2
Josh Reed	F	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Rayvon Griffith	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.8Possessions62.8

78.0Offensive Efficiency133.8

133.8Defensive Efficiency78.0

-55.7Net Efficiency55.7

36.0%Effective FG%53.1%

42.9%True Shooting %56.4%

25.3%Turnover Rate9.6%

30.0%Free Throw Rate30.8%

28.0%3-Point Rate49.2%

0.63Assist / Turnover2.83

Game Summary

Cincinnati won by 35 points. The game played at approximately 62.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.