UCLA

24-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

27.8%UCLA

72.2%Nebraska

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNebraska -8.0

PROJECTED TOTAL146.6

MODEL MONEYLINENebraska -260

Nebraska

28-7

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUCLA 69

Projected Total146.6

Projected ScoreNebraska 77

Team Comparison

UCLAMetricNebraska

63MMH Power Index67

115.9Offensive Efficiency114.4

106.9Defensive Efficiency98.3

9.0Net Efficiency16.1

5.1Strength of Schedule6.1

8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8

66.5Tempo67.3

53.5%Effective FG%55.6%

13.4%Turnover Rate14.4%

30.7%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

33.8%Free Throw Rate26.9%

6.0Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Nebraska HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–63.0), defensive efficiency (98.3–106.9), net efficiency (16.1–9.0), strength of schedule (6.1–5.1).

UCLA COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.9–114.4), recent form (8.0–6.8), ball security (13.4–14.4).

Final

UCLA

58—66

Nebraska

Nebraska by 8 • 71.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UCLATEAM STATNebraska

22-57FG17-52

39.0%FG%33.0%

4-283PT7-25

14.0%3PT%28.0%

10-13FT25-29

77.0%FT%86.0%

34Rebounds39

6Offensive Rebounds9

13Assists11

15Turnovers13

5Steals10

2Blocks1

24Fouls16

Player Box Score

UCLA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Bilodeau	F	33	6-9	1-3	2-2	5	0	0	0	15
Lazar Stefanovic	Guard	27	3-9	2-6	2-2	4	1	0	0	10
Skyy Clark	G	31	4-8	0-3	1-1	3	1	0	0	9
Sebastian Mack	G	28	3-11	0-4	3-5	3	6	3	0	9
Kobe Johnson	Guard	33	3-9	1-6	1-1	11	3	1	0	8
Aday Mara	C	11	2-2	0-0	1-2	1	1	1	2	5
Dylan Andrews	G	19	1-6	0-4	0-0	3	1	0	0	2
Trent Perry	G	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Dominick Harris	G	8	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Nebraska

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Brice Williams	Guard	33	2-12	1-5	11-12	6	2	1	0	16
Andrew Morgan	Forward	21	4-5	0-1	4-4	3	1	1	0	12
Rollie Worster	Guard	27	3-9	1-3	4-4	4	2	0	0	11
Juwan Gary	Forward	28	3-7	3-5	1-2	4	0	2	1	10
Sam Hoiberg	G	22	2-3	1-2	2-2	3	2	3	0	7
Berke Buyuktuncel	F	23	1-8	1-3	1-2	9	0	0	0	4
Connor Essegian	G	21	0-6	0-6	2-2	3	3	2	0	2
Braxton Meah	Center	15	1-1	0-0	0-1	3	0	1	0	2
Ahron Ulis	Guard	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	2
Cale Jacobsen	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.0Possessions71.0

81.7Offensive Efficiency93.0

93.0Defensive Efficiency81.7

-11.3Net Efficiency11.3

42.1%Effective FG%39.4%

45.9%True Shooting %50.2%

20.8%Turnover Rate18.6%

22.8%Free Throw Rate55.8%

49.1%3-Point Rate48.1%

0.87Assist / Turnover0.85

Game Summary

Nebraska won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 71.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.