
Villanova
24-9GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.7%Villanova
73.3%BYU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBYU -7.4
PROJECTED TOTAL156.6
MODEL MONEYLINEBYU -275

BYU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVillanova 75
Projected Total156.6
Projected ScoreBYU 82
Team Comparison
59.4MMH Power Index63.9
114.7Offensive Efficiency118.3
105.9Defensive Efficiency106.8
8.8Net Efficiency11.5
4.4Strength of Schedule6.5
-1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.2
67.3Tempo70.6
53.9%Effective FG%54.7%
15.0%Turnover Rate15.2%
31.8%Offensive Rebound %33.7%
31.4%Free Throw Rate35.4%
5.9Average Margin8.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
BYU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBYU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–59.4), offensive efficiency (118.3–114.7), net efficiency (11.5–8.8), strength of schedule (6.5–4.4).
Villanova COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.9–106.8), recent form (-1.1–-2.2), ball security (15.0–15.2).