Evansville

7-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.0%Evansville

99.0%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -32.7

PROJECTED TOTAL149.4

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -9900

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreEvansville 58

Projected Total149.4

Projected ScorePurdue 91

Team Comparison

EvansvilleMetricPurdue

31.6MMH Power Index73.2

98.5Offensive Efficiency124.8

112.4Defensive Efficiency107.8

-13.9Net Efficiency17.0

1.8Strength of Schedule7.6

-23.0Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

68.0Tempo65.4

50.0%Effective FG%57.8%

18.9%Turnover Rate13.7%

22.2%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

30.8%Free Throw Rate29.1%

-9.5Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY99.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–31.6), offensive efficiency (124.8–98.5), defensive efficiency (107.8–112.4), net efficiency (17.0–-13.9).

Evansville COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (30.8–29.1).

Final

Evansville

51—82

Purdue

Purdue by 31 • 61.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

EvansvilleTEAM STATPurdue

21-70FG28-59

30.0%FG%47.0%

7-343PT13-29

21.0%3PT%45.0%

2-4FT13-16

50.0%FT%81.0%

40Rebounds40

20Offensive Rebounds12

13Assists22

10Turnovers7

2Steals4

2Blocks4

15Fouls9

Player Box Score

Evansville

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joshua Hughes	F	30	6-12	3-7	0-0	11	1	0	0	15
AJ Casey	F	29	6-13	0-3	2-2	9	2	0	0	14
Trent Hundley	F	17	3-8	3-8	0-0	1	1	0	0	9
Bryce Quinet	G	29	2-9	0-4	0-2	2	1	1	0	4
James Dyson-Merwe	F	16	2-2	0-0	0-0	7	2	0	0	4
Alex Hemenway	G	11	1-6	1-4	0-0	0	0	1	0	3
Keishon Porter	G	29	1-11	0-3	0-0	3	2	0	1	2
Leif Moeller	G	31	0-9	0-5	0-0	2	3	0	1	0
Kaia Berridge	G	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Fletcher Loyer	G	28	8-11	7-10	7-8	0	1	0	0	30
Jack Benter	G	22	4-7	3-6	0-0	6	2	0	1	11
Daniel Jacobsen	C	21	4-10	0-2	3-4	8	0	0	2	11
Oscar Cluff	C	19	3-5	0-0	3-4	10	3	1	1	9
Omer Mayer	G	18	3-7	1-3	0-0	2	1	0	0	7
Braden Smith	G	30	3-9	0-2	0-0	2	11	2	0	6
Gicarri Harris	G	20	1-6	1-3	0-0	3	2	0	0	3
Liam Murphy	F	18	1-3	1-3	0-0	0	0	1	0	3
Aaron Fine	G	1	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
C.J. Cox	G	20	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	2	0	0	0
Jace Rayl	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jack Lusk	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.8Possessions61.8

82.5Offensive Efficiency132.7

132.7Defensive Efficiency82.5

-50.2Net Efficiency50.2

35.0%Effective FG%58.5%

35.5%True Shooting %61.6%

16.2%Turnover Rate11.4%

5.7%Free Throw Rate27.1%

48.6%3-Point Rate49.2%

1.30Assist / Turnover3.14

Game Summary

Purdue won by 31 points. The game played at approximately 61.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.