Oakland

16-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

5.7%Oakland

94.3%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -18.1

PROJECTED TOTAL162.3

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -1654

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreOakland 72

Projected Total162.3

Projected ScorePurdue 90

Team Comparison

OaklandMetricPurdue

52.6MMH Power Index73.2

115.7Offensive Efficiency124.8

114.5Defensive Efficiency107.8

1.2Net Efficiency17.0

2.1Strength of Schedule7.6

-1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

71.4Tempo65.4

53.3%Effective FG%57.8%

14.7%Turnover Rate13.7%

31.3%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

38.5%Free Throw Rate29.1%

0.9Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–52.6), offensive efficiency (124.8–115.7), defensive efficiency (107.8–114.5), net efficiency (17.0–1.2).

Oakland COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (38.5–29.1).

Final

Oakland

77—87

Purdue

Purdue by 10 • 69.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

OaklandTEAM STATPurdue

30-68FG32-68

44.0%FG%47.0%

8-263PT13-35

31.0%3PT%37.0%

9-12FT10-15

75.0%FT%67.0%

39Rebounds37

12Offensive Rebounds11

14Assists22

9Turnovers5

4Steals4

2Blocks7

14Fouls12

Player Box Score

Oakland

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ziare Wells	G	37	9-16	0-1	3-3	12	1	1	0	21
Nassim Mashhour	G	35	6-12	3-8	0-0	5	1	0	0	15
Tuburu Naivalurua	F	35	5-15	1-5	0-0	7	4	1	2	11
Brody Robinson	G	35	4-12	2-7	1-2	1	4	2	0	11
Isaac Garrett	F	33	4-8	0-1	2-3	5	3	0	0	10
Brett White II	G	15	2-4	2-4	1-2	4	1	0	0	7
Khoi Thurmon	G	9	0-1	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	2
Nate Deer	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Braden Smith	G	37	8-15	2-4	2-4	7	9	0	0	20
Fletcher Loyer	G	32	5-11	3-7	2-2	3	1	1	0	15
Oscar Cluff	C	29	5-6	0-0	4-5	9	2	1	4	14
C.J. Cox	G	26	5-9	2-6	2-2	2	2	0	0	14
Jack Benter	G	29	4-9	3-7	0-0	7	3	1	0	11
Liam Murphy	F	10	4-7	3-6	0-0	2	0	0	0	11
Daniel Jacobsen	C	11	1-2	0-0	0-2	2	1	0	3	2
Gicarri Harris	G	15	0-6	0-3	0-0	0	2	1	0	0
Omer Mayer	G	11	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	2	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.9Possessions69.9

110.2Offensive Efficiency124.5

124.5Defensive Efficiency110.2

-14.3Net Efficiency14.3

50.0%Effective FG%56.6%

52.2%True Shooting %57.9%

12.7%Turnover Rate7.2%

17.6%Free Throw Rate22.1%

38.2%3-Point Rate51.5%

1.56Assist / Turnover4.40

Game Summary

Purdue won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 69.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.