New Hampshire

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

7.0%New Hampshire

93.0%Harvard

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHarvard -16.5

PROJECTED TOTAL139.9

MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -1329

Harvard

17-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 62

Projected Total139.9

Projected ScoreHarvard 78

Team Comparison

New HampshireMetricHarvard

34MMH Power Index52.6

99.6Offensive Efficiency108.1

107.5Defensive Efficiency102.9

-7.9Net Efficiency5.2

-3.4Strength of Schedule-0.1

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3

69.4Tempo64.8

47.6%Effective FG%53.4%

16.1%Turnover Rate17.2%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

29.4%Free Throw Rate27.9%

-5.5Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–34.0), offensive efficiency (108.1–99.6), defensive efficiency (102.9–107.5), net efficiency (5.2–-7.9).

New Hampshire COUNTERS WITHball security (16.1–17.2), offensive rebounding (26.7–26.3), free throw rate (29.4–27.9).

Final

New Hampshire

75—86

Harvard

Harvard by 11 • 70.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

New HampshireTEAM STATHarvard

28-58FG31-56

48.0%FG%55.0%

10-233PT9-18

43.0%3PT%50.0%

9-10FT15-18

90.0%FT%83.0%

27Rebounds30

5Offensive Rebounds5

12Assists15

14Turnovers9

7Steals9

1Blocks3

20Fouls10

Player Box Score

New Hampshire

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Belal El Shakery	F	26	9-15	1-2	0-0	8	1	3	0	19
Jack Graham	G	34	6-10	4-6	1-2	2	1	2	0	17
R.J. Kennedy	G	21	5-7	4-5	1-1	2	0	1	0	15
KiJan Robinson	G	30	4-10	1-2	3-3	1	6	0	0	12
Comeh Emuobor	G	22	2-10	0-4	2-2	4	0	0	0	6
John Squire	F	29	1-1	0-0	2-2	4	3	0	1	4
Davide Poser	F	25	1-4	0-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Jon O'Neill	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	0
Giannos Xanthopoulos	C	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Tyler Bike	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chandler Pigge	G	36	8-11	2-4	5-7	2	6	3	0	23
Robert Hinton	G	36	9-16	0-1	4-4	4	2	1	0	22
Tey Barbour	G	36	4-9	4-6	2-2	6	1	0	0	14
Austin Hunt	G	35	5-8	1-4	2-2	6	3	2	0	13
Thomas Batties III	F	31	4-10	2-3	2-2	5	1	1	2	12
Ryan Sullivan	F	4	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Kenan Parrish	F	12	0-0	0-0	0-1	3	0	1	1	0
Ben Eisendrath	G	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0
Frankie Mannino	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.2Possessions70.2

106.8Offensive Efficiency122.5

122.5Defensive Efficiency106.8

-15.7Net Efficiency15.7

56.9%Effective FG%63.4%

59.8%True Shooting %66.6%

19.5%Turnover Rate13.1%

17.2%Free Throw Rate32.1%

39.7%3-Point Rate32.1%

0.86Assist / Turnover1.67

Game Summary

Harvard won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 70.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.