Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

23.1%Lipscomb

76.9%Mercer

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMercer -8.6

PROJECTED TOTAL157.4

MODEL MONEYLINEMercer -333

Mercer

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 74

Projected Total157.4

Projected ScoreMercer 83

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricMercer

47.9MMH Power Index54.1

111.3Offensive Efficiency116.6

107.6Defensive Efficiency106.5

3.7Net Efficiency10.1

-2.5Strength of Schedule-4.4

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency1.2

68.8Tempo70.9

54.8%Effective FG%53.8%

16.0%Turnover Rate14.7%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %33.6%

26.5%Free Throw Rate38.9%

2.5Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Mercer HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMercer holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–47.9), offensive efficiency (116.6–111.3), defensive efficiency (106.5–107.6), net efficiency (10.1–3.7).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.5–-4.4), shooting efficiency (54.8–53.8).

Final

Lipscomb

77—92

Mercer

Mercer by 15 • 68.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATMercer

30-67FG37-65

45.0%FG%57.0%

11-323PT9-20

34.0%3PT%45.0%

6-7FT9-13

86.0%FT%69.0%

31Rebounds35

12Offensive Rebounds11

23Assists21

11Turnovers8

6Steals9

3Blocks5

16Fouls8

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ross Candelino	G	29	7-11	3-7	0-0	4	3	1	0	17
Charlie Williams	C	33	6-14	2-7	0-0	7	6	1	1	14
Mateo Esmeraldo	G	30	4-7	2-4	2-2	4	11	0	0	12
Ethan Duncan	G	23	4-11	0-4	2-2	2	0	1	0	10
Titas Sargiunas	F	23	3-7	2-3	0-0	2	1	1	0	8
Grant Asman	F	17	2-8	1-5	1-1	3	0	1	1	6
Or Ashkenazi	F	15	2-2	1-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	5
Kennedy Okpara	F	13	2-4	0-1	0-0	2	0	1	1	4
Kellan Boylan	F	5	0-2	0-0	1-2	2	1	0	0	1
Cole Middleton	F	12	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Mercer

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Zaire Williams	G	32	6-10	5-7	2-2	3	3	4	1	19
Armani Mighty	C	32	9-12	0-0	0-0	10	1	1	2	18
Quinton Perkins II	G	33	6-11	3-6	1-2	0	3	1	1	16
Baraka Okojie	G	31	6-12	0-2	4-6	4	12	0	0	16
Brady Shoulders	G	35	6-11	0-2	2-3	14	1	3	1	14
Kyle Cuffe Jr.	G	11	3-5	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Tristan Gross	G	18	1-3	1-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	3
Bendji Pierre	F	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.8Possessions68.8

111.9Offensive Efficiency133.7

133.7Defensive Efficiency111.9

-21.8Net Efficiency21.8

53.0%Effective FG%63.8%

54.7%True Shooting %64.6%

15.9%Turnover Rate11.7%

10.4%Free Throw Rate20.0%

47.8%3-Point Rate30.8%

2.09Assist / Turnover2.63

Game Summary

Mercer won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 68.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.