Purdue

30-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

47.6%Purdue

52.4%Alabama

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama -1.6

PROJECTED TOTAL168.2

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -110

Alabama

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePurdue 83

Projected Total168.2

Projected ScoreAlabama 85

Team Comparison

PurdueMetricAlabama

73.2MMH Power Index69.5

124.8Offensive Efficiency121.6

107.8Defensive Efficiency111.2

17.0Net Efficiency10.4

7.6Strength of Schedule9.4

11.8Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5

65.4Tempo74.7

57.8%Effective FG%54.9%

13.7%Turnover Rate13.0%

36.2%Offensive Rebound %32.1%

29.1%Free Throw Rate36.9%

11.1Average Margin7.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–69.5), offensive efficiency (124.8–121.6), defensive efficiency (107.8–111.2), net efficiency (17.0–10.4).

Alabama COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (9.4–7.6), ball security (13.0–13.7), free throw rate (36.9–29.1).

Final

Purdue

87—80

Alabama

Purdue by 7 • 68.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PurdueTEAM STATAlabama

31-66FG28-66

47.0%FG%42.0%

9-213PT16-43

43.0%3PT%37.0%

16-23FT8-10

70.0%FT%80.0%

52Rebounds28

19Offensive Rebounds7

16Assists17

10Turnovers6

3Steals8

—Blocks4

15Fouls19

Player Box Score

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Braden Smith	G	34	7-19	5-10	10-12	7	4	0	29
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	34	9-16	1-2	0-0	15	5	0	19
Oscar Cluff	C	24	3-7	0-0	3-4	11	2	0	9
Daniel Jacobsen	C	16	4-6	0-0	1-3	5	1	0	9
Fletcher Loyer	G	31	3-8	1-4	0-0	3	2	2	7
Omer Mayer	G	17	3-5	1-3	0-1	0	2	0	7
Gicarri Harris	G	15	1-3	1-1	1-2	4	0	1	4
C.J. Cox	G	23	1-2	0-1	1-1	2	0	0	3
Jack Benter	G	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0

Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Aden Holloway	G	35	7-13	5-9	2-2	2	3	0	0	21
Taylor Bol Bowen	F	26	4-7	3-6	2-2	2	0	2	1	13
Aiden Sherrell	F	23	4-5	1-2	3-3	4	1	2	0	12
Labaron Philon Jr.	G	28	5-14	1-6	0-1	4	7	3	1	11
Houston Mallette	G	19	3-7	3-6	0-0	2	2	0	0	9
Latrell Wrightsell	G	30	2-9	1-6	1-1	3	2	0	1	6
Amari Allen	F	20	1-4	1-2	0-0	4	1	1	0	3
Noah Williamson	C	9	1-3	1-3	0-1	1	0	0	1	3
London Jemison	F	6	1-4	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Davion Hannah	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.9Possessions68.9

126.3Offensive Efficiency116.1

116.1Defensive Efficiency126.3

10.2Net Efficiency-10.2

53.8%Effective FG%54.5%

56.5%True Shooting %56.5%

14.7%Turnover Rate8.6%

34.8%Free Throw Rate15.2%

31.8%3-Point Rate65.2%

1.60Assist / Turnover2.83

Game Summary

Purdue won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 68.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.