
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.7%UT Rio Grande Valley
94.3%Illinois
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADIllinois -17.9
PROJECTED TOTAL150.3
MODEL MONEYLINEIllinois -1654

Illinois
28-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 66
Projected Total150.3
Projected ScoreIllinois 84
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index76.5
112.6Offensive Efficiency125.0
103.1Defensive Efficiency103.3
9.5Net Efficiency21.7
-1.9Strength of Schedule6.7
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency12.7
67.4Tempo66.5
55.7%Effective FG%54.8%
17.9%Turnover Rate13.1%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %39.3%
29.6%Free Throw Rate33.8%
6.4Average Margin14.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Illinois HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMIllinois holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.5–55.8), offensive efficiency (125.0–112.6), net efficiency (21.7–9.5), strength of schedule (6.7–-1.9).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.1–103.3), shooting efficiency (55.7–54.8).