
Rutgers
13-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.6%Rutgers
95.4%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -20.8
PROJECTED TOTAL148.4
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -2074

Tennessee
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRutgers 64
Projected Total148.4
Projected ScoreTennessee 85
Team Comparison
45.9MMH Power Index68.6
104.2Offensive Efficiency115.8
112.2Defensive Efficiency102.1
-8.0Net Efficiency13.7
3.9Strength of Schedule7.8
-1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
67.4Tempo68.1
47.4%Effective FG%51.6%
15.0%Turnover Rate17.3%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
36.3%Free Throw Rate38.6%
-5.4Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–45.9), offensive efficiency (115.8–104.2), defensive efficiency (102.1–112.2), net efficiency (13.7–-8.0).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHball security (15.0–17.3).