
Gonzaga
31-4GAME THAT MATTERSAT
56.5%Gonzaga
43.5%Alabama
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGonzaga -2.3
PROJECTED TOTAL166.9
MODEL MONEYLINEGonzaga -130

Alabama
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGonzaga 85
Projected Total166.9
Projected ScoreAlabama 82
Team Comparison
76.4MMH Power Index69.5
119.7Offensive Efficiency121.6
94.0Defensive Efficiency111.2
25.7Net Efficiency10.4
3.0Strength of Schedule9.4
18.2Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5
70.4Tempo74.7
55.7%Effective FG%54.9%
13.6%Turnover Rate13.0%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
31.5%Free Throw Rate36.9%
18.1Average Margin7.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Gonzaga HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGonzaga holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.4–69.5), defensive efficiency (94.0–111.2), net efficiency (25.7–10.4), recent form (18.2–9.5).
Alabama COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (121.6–119.7), strength of schedule (9.4–3.0), ball security (13.0–13.6).