UCLA logo

UCLA

24-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
55.4%UCLA
44.6%California
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCalifornia -0.4
PROJECTED TOTAL151.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -124
California logo

California

22-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUCLA 76
Projected Total151.8
Projected ScoreCalifornia 76

Team Comparison

63MMH Power Index56.5
115.9Offensive Efficiency111.8
106.9Defensive Efficiency104.8
9.0Net Efficiency7.0
5.1Strength of Schedule2.8
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency1.8
66.5Tempo69.9
53.5%Effective FG%52.6%
13.4%Turnover Rate14.9%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
33.8%Free Throw Rate36.8%
6.0Average Margin4.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UCLA HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–56.5), offensive efficiency (115.9–111.8), net efficiency (9.0–7.0), strength of schedule (5.1–2.8).
California COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.8–106.9), free throw rate (36.8–33.8).
Final
UCLA logo
UCLA
72—80
California logo
California
California by 8 • 70.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UCLATEAM STATCalifornia
26-64FG26-58
41.0%FG%45.0%
7-223PT11-22
32.0%3PT%50.0%
13-23FT17-22
57.0%FT%77.0%
41Rebounds35
14Offensive Rebounds7
17Assists15
11Turnovers8
2Steals7
5Blocks4
19Fouls23

Player Box Score

UCLA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Eric Dailey Jr.G357-153-70-173000017
Trent PerryG255-91-26-933000017
Xavier BookerF324-90-02-440030010
Jamar BrownG293-72-51-16111009
Skyy ClarkG252-81-42-25100007
Brandon WilliamsG113-50-10-02100006
Donovan DentG311-80-21-44711003
Steven Jamerson IIF91-10-01-23100003
Eric FreenyG30-20-10-00000000
California
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chris BellF316-115-75-560210022
Dai Dai AmesG245-122-42-200000014
Justin PippenG294-103-62-233210013
Rytis PetraitisF234-60-04-471100012
Semetri CarrG132-70-22-23400006
John CamdenF252-51-20-03101005
DeJuan CampbellG162-50-10-02200004
Lee DortF161-20-01-23001003
Milos IlicC230-00-01-54420001

Advanced Game Stats

70.7Possessions70.7
101.8Offensive Efficiency113.2
113.2Defensive Efficiency101.8
-11.3Net Efficiency11.3
46.1%Effective FG%54.3%
48.0%True Shooting %58.4%
15.3%Turnover Rate11.5%
35.9%Free Throw Rate37.9%
34.4%3-Point Rate37.9%
1.55Assist / Turnover1.88
Game Summary
California won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 70.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.