UNLV

18-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

8.6%UNLV

91.4%Alabama

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama -15.4

PROJECTED TOTAL171.4

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -1063

Alabama

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUNLV 78

Projected Total171.4

Projected ScoreAlabama 93

Team Comparison

UNLVMetricAlabama

52.8MMH Power Index69.5

111.0Offensive Efficiency121.6

109.6Defensive Efficiency111.2

1.4Net Efficiency10.4

2.7Strength of Schedule9.4

1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5

71.4Tempo74.7

53.7%Effective FG%54.9%

17.2%Turnover Rate13.0%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %32.1%

41.6%Free Throw Rate36.9%

1.0Average Margin7.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–52.8), offensive efficiency (121.6–111.0), net efficiency (10.4–1.4), strength of schedule (9.4–2.7).

UNLV COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.6–111.2), free throw rate (41.6–36.9).

Final

UNLV

76—115

Alabama

Alabama by 39 • 78.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UNLVTEAM STATAlabama

30-71FG36-65

42.0%FG%55.0%

9-283PT14-33

32.0%3PT%42.0%

7-14FT29-35

50.0%FT%83.0%

28Rebounds48

10Offensive Rebounds14

16Assists20

10Turnovers12

8Steals7

2Blocks6

23Fouls14

Player Box Score

UNLV

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dra Gibbs-Lawhorn	G	34	9-19	3-8	4-5	4	1	3	0	25
Issac Williamson	G	29	6-16	4-10	2-4	2	2	0	1	18
Kimani Hamilton	F	32	6-15	0-3	1-1	5	4	0	0	13
Howie Fleming Jr.	G	32	3-6	1-1	0-0	4	1	1	0	7
Al Green	G	18	3-5	1-3	0-0	1	0	2	0	7
Tyrin Jones	F	33	2-4	0-0	0-4	3	6	1	1	4
Walter Brown	F	12	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	2	1	0	2
Ladji Dembele	F	10	0-3	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Aden Holloway	G	25	9-14	5-6	3-3	4	4	0	0	26
Houston Mallette	G	21	5-14	4-12	5-5	2	2	3	0	19
London Jemison	F	24	5-7	2-3	6-7	5	0	0	0	18
Labaron Philon Jr.	G	23	6-10	0-3	1-3	4	4	2	0	13
Amari Allen	F	18	4-6	2-4	3-4	5	6	0	2	13
Taylor Bol Bowen	F	20	3-6	1-4	5-5	7	0	1	1	12
Aiden Sherrell	F	13	3-5	0-0	1-2	8	1	0	1	7
Noah Williamson	C	17	1-1	0-0	2-2	6	2	0	0	4
Keitenn Bristow	F	12	0-2	0-1	3-4	3	0	0	1	3
Davion Hannah	G	25	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	0
Jacob Martin	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

78.7Possessions78.7

96.6Offensive Efficiency146.1

146.1Defensive Efficiency96.6

-49.6Net Efficiency49.6

48.6%Effective FG%66.2%

48.9%True Shooting %70.4%

12.9%Turnover Rate15.1%

19.7%Free Throw Rate53.8%

39.4%3-Point Rate50.8%

1.60Assist / Turnover1.67

Game Summary

Alabama won by 39 points. The game played at approximately 78.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.