
UAB
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.5%UAB
50.5%Middle Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiddle Tennessee -0.9
PROJECTED TOTAL152.7
MODEL MONEYLINEMiddle Tennessee -102

Middle Tennessee
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 76
Projected Total152.7
Projected ScoreMiddle Tennessee 77
Team Comparison
56.9MMH Power Index52.5
110.5Offensive Efficiency109.6
102.9Defensive Efficiency105.7
7.6Net Efficiency3.9
0.4Strength of Schedule0.4
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
71.7Tempo68.8
48.8%Effective FG%52.2%
12.4%Turnover Rate16.7%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %31.3%
36.9%Free Throw Rate33.2%
5.4Average Margin2.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–52.5), offensive efficiency (110.5–109.6), defensive efficiency (102.9–105.7), net efficiency (7.6–3.9).
Middle Tennessee COUNTERS WITHrecent form (3.2–2.9), shooting efficiency (52.2–48.8).