South Carolina State logo

South Carolina State

10-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.4%South Carolina State
75.6%Chicago State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADChicago State -7.8
PROJECTED TOTAL144.5
MODEL MONEYLINEChicago State -310
Chicago State logo

Chicago State

7-25
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSouth Carolina State 68
Projected Total144.5
Projected ScoreChicago State 76

Team Comparison

30.5MMH Power Index36.1
95.6Offensive Efficiency99.4
112.3Defensive Efficiency114.9
-16.7Net Efficiency-15.5
-2.7Strength of Schedule0.5
-6.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
70.2Tempo66.2
46.7%Effective FG%45.6%
21.1%Turnover Rate15.8%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %29.1%
42.0%Free Throw Rate30.7%
-11.7Average Margin-10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Chicago State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMChicago State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (36.1–30.5), offensive efficiency (99.4–95.6), net efficiency (-15.5–-16.7), strength of schedule (0.5–-2.7).
South Carolina State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (112.3–114.9), shooting efficiency (46.7–45.6), offensive rebounding (31.7–29.1).
Final
South Carolina State logo
South Carolina State
0—0
Chicago State logo
Chicago State
Tied • 0.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

South Carolina StateTEAM STATChicago State
null-nullFGnull-null
38.0%FG%41.0%
null-null3PTnull-null
32.0%3PT%30.0%
null-nullFTnull-null
0.0%FT%0.0%
—Rebounds—
—Offensive Rebounds—
—Assists—
—Turnovers—
—Steals—
—Blocks—
—Fouls—

Advanced Game Stats

0.0Possessions0.0
0.0Offensive Efficiency0.0
0.0Defensive Efficiency0.0
0.0Net Efficiency0.0
0.0%Effective FG%0.0%
0.0%True Shooting %0.0%
0.0%Turnover Rate0.0%
0.0%Free Throw Rate0.0%
0.0%3-Point Rate0.0%
0.00Assist / Turnover0.00
Game Summary
Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 0.0 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.