Purdue

30-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

92.6%Purdue

7.4%Rutgers

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -14.9

PROJECTED TOTAL150.8

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -1251

Rutgers

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePurdue 83

Projected Total150.8

Projected ScoreRutgers 68

Team Comparison

PurdueMetricRutgers

73.2MMH Power Index45.9

124.8Offensive Efficiency104.2

107.8Defensive Efficiency112.2

17.0Net Efficiency-8.0

7.6Strength of Schedule3.9

11.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6

65.4Tempo67.4

57.8%Effective FG%47.4%

13.7%Turnover Rate15.0%

36.2%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

29.1%Free Throw Rate36.3%

11.1Average Margin-5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–45.9), offensive efficiency (124.8–104.2), defensive efficiency (107.8–112.2), net efficiency (17.0–-8.0).

Rutgers COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (36.3–29.1).

Final

Purdue

81—65

Rutgers

Purdue by 16 • 64.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PurdueTEAM STATRutgers

27-58FG25-56

47.0%FG%45.0%

10-263PT8-17

38.0%3PT%47.0%

17-20FT7-11

85.0%FT%64.0%

36Rebounds25

11Offensive Rebounds6

18Assists12

9Turnovers9

4Steals6

2Blocks2

14Fouls18

Player Box Score

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	32	7-11	0-0	5-7	13	3	1	0	19
Braden Smith	G	35	5-11	4-8	2-2	3	8	0	0	16
Fletcher Loyer	G	28	3-11	2-7	4-4	2	2	1	0	12
Gicarri Harris	G	21	4-5	3-4	0-0	2	2	1	0	11
Oscar Cluff	C	24	4-8	0-0	0-0	3	2	0	0	8
C.J. Cox	G	23	1-5	0-3	4-4	5	0	0	0	6
Daniel Jacobsen	C	13	1-1	0-0	1-2	4	0	1	2	3
Omer Mayer	G	13	1-5	0-3	1-1	0	0	0	0	3
Liam Murphy	F	11	1-1	1-1	0-0	3	1	0	0	3

Rutgers

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dylan Grant	F	24	5-10	1-3	2-2	2	0	1	0	13
Harun Zrno	G	16	5-8	3-5	0-0	1	2	0	0	13
Jamichael Davis	G	31	3-4	1-2	2-2	0	5	0	0	9
Darren Buchanan Jr.	G	24	3-8	1-2	1-2	1	1	2	0	8
Tariq Francis	G	19	2-5	1-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	5
Kaden Powers	G	12	2-6	1-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	5
Bryce Dortch	F	13	1-1	0-0	1-2	2	0	1	1	3
Lino Mark	G	13	1-2	0-0	1-2	1	3	0	0	3
Emmanuel Ogbole	C	19	1-5	0-0	0-1	6	0	1	0	2
Chris Nwuli	F	17	1-3	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	1	2
Denis Badalau	F	4	1-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Gevonte Ware	C	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Baye Fall	C	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.9Possessions64.9

124.8Offensive Efficiency100.2

100.2Defensive Efficiency124.8

24.7Net Efficiency-24.7

55.2%Effective FG%51.8%

60.0%True Shooting %53.1%

13.7%Turnover Rate14.0%

34.5%Free Throw Rate19.6%

44.8%3-Point Rate30.4%

2.00Assist / Turnover1.33

Game Summary

Purdue won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 64.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.