UCLA

24-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

53.7%UCLA

46.3%Washington

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWashington -0.5

PROJECTED TOTAL151.3

MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -116

Washington

16-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUCLA 75

Projected Total151.3

Projected ScoreWashington 76

Team Comparison

UCLAMetricWashington

63MMH Power Index57.1

115.9Offensive Efficiency112.2

106.9Defensive Efficiency107.1

9.0Net Efficiency5.1

5.1Strength of Schedule4.2

8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency0.7

66.5Tempo68.7

53.5%Effective FG%51.4%

13.4%Turnover Rate15.3%

30.7%Offensive Rebound %34.2%

33.8%Free Throw Rate30.9%

6.0Average Margin3.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UCLA HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–57.1), offensive efficiency (115.9–112.2), defensive efficiency (106.9–107.1), net efficiency (9.0–5.1).

Washington COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (34.2–30.7).

Final

UCLA

82—80

Washington

UCLA by 2 • 65.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UCLATEAM STATWashington

28-53FG31-60

53.0%FG%52.0%

9-203PT9-24

45.0%3PT%38.0%

17-24FT9-12

71.0%FT%75.0%

21Rebounds33

8Offensive Rebounds14

15Assists14

7Turnovers15

7Steals6

5Blocks—

19Fouls20

Player Box Score

UCLA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Skyy Clark	G	39	7-9	6-7	5-6	2	3	1	2	25
Tyler Bilodeau	F	30	7-14	1-6	6-7	5	0	1	0	21
Donovan Dent	G	39	6-13	0-1	5-6	3	8	2	1	17
Xavier Booker	F	17	3-5	1-2	1-2	3	2	0	0	8
Jamar Brown	G	26	3-6	1-3	0-0	6	0	1	0	7
Steven Jamerson II	F	21	2-2	0-0	0-1	2	2	2	1	4
Eric Dailey Jr.	G	16	0-3	0-1	0-2	0	0	0	0	0
Brandon Williams	G	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Eric Freeny	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Washington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Hannes Steinbach	F	32	11-12	0-0	7-8	10	3	1	29
Zoom Diallo	G	34	8-13	2-5	1-2	3	4	0	19
Quimari Peterson	G	36	5-9	2-5	0-0	1	2	3	12
Wesley Yates III	G	33	4-13	4-10	0-1	3	1	1	12
Desmond Claude	G	20	2-6	1-3	0-0	3	4	1	5
Franck Kepnang	C	27	1-5	0-0	1-1	7	0	0	3
Lathan Sommerville	C	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0
JJ Mandaquit	G	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.1Possessions65.1

126.0Offensive Efficiency122.9

122.9Defensive Efficiency126.0

3.1Net Efficiency-3.1

61.3%Effective FG%59.2%

63.7%True Shooting %60.9%

11.0%Turnover Rate22.5%

45.3%Free Throw Rate20.0%

37.7%3-Point Rate40.0%

2.14Assist / Turnover0.93

Game Summary

UCLA won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 65.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.