
Rider
4-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.7%Rider
96.3%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -21.1
PROJECTED TOTAL136.1
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -2603

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 58
Projected Total136.1
Projected ScoreMerrimack 79
Team Comparison
29.1MMH Power Index53.7
96.3Offensive Efficiency106.4
115.3Defensive Efficiency103.2
-19.0Net Efficiency3.2
-0.9Strength of Schedule0.7
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
65.9Tempo64.4
43.4%Effective FG%49.3%
17.1%Turnover Rate14.8%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
31.5%Free Throw Rate39.5%
-12.6Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY96.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–29.1), offensive efficiency (106.4–96.3), defensive efficiency (103.2–115.3), net efficiency (3.2–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.8–24.7).