Rider logo

Rider

4-25
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.7%Rider
96.3%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -21.1
PROJECTED TOTAL136.1
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -2603
Merrimack logo

Merrimack

23-11
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 58
Projected Total136.1
Projected ScoreMerrimack 79

Team Comparison

29.1MMH Power Index53.7
96.3Offensive Efficiency106.4
115.3Defensive Efficiency103.2
-19.0Net Efficiency3.2
-0.9Strength of Schedule0.7
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
65.9Tempo64.4
43.4%Effective FG%49.3%
17.1%Turnover Rate14.8%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
31.5%Free Throw Rate39.5%
-12.6Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–29.1), offensive efficiency (106.4–96.3), defensive efficiency (103.2–115.3), net efficiency (3.2–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.8–24.7).
Final
Rider logo
Rider
66—68
Merrimack logo
Merrimack
Merrimack by 2 • 62.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RiderTEAM STATMerrimack
26-54FG25-54
48.0%FG%46.0%
4-123PT11-29
33.0%3PT%38.0%
10-16FT7-11
63.0%FT%64.0%
41Rebounds19
13Offensive Rebounds5
9Assists13
15Turnovers8
4Steals8
3Blocks7
14Fouls8

Player Box Score

Rider
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cole McCabeF254-100-24-440000012
Flash BurtonG365-121-60-133300011
Caleb SmithG333-60-03-410200009
Zion CruzG224-91-20-05100009
Mohamad DialloF144-40-00-22111008
Shemani FullerF263-60-01-212102007
Kristupas KepežinskasG191-21-12-31000005
Antwan WilsonG122-31-10-01000005
AB CoulibalyG60-20-00-01000000
Devean WilliamsG40-00-00-00100000
Jamir McNeilG30-00-00-00000000
Merrimack
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Andrés MarreroG299-144-91-230300023
Kevair KennedyG406-151-26-833300019
Tye DorsetG346-93-60-041220015
Ernest SheltonG382-92-90-12001006
Todd BrognaF352-51-30-03703005
KC UgwuakaziF130-20-00-01201000
Dylan VeilletteF70-00-00-01000000
Jaylen StinsonG40-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

62.9Possessions62.9
104.9Offensive Efficiency108.1
108.1Defensive Efficiency104.9
-3.2Net Efficiency3.2
51.9%Effective FG%56.5%
53.6%True Shooting %57.4%
23.6%Turnover Rate12.9%
29.6%Free Throw Rate20.4%
22.2%3-Point Rate53.7%
0.60Assist / Turnover1.63
Game Summary
Merrimack won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 62.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.