UTSA

5-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.0%UTSA

99.0%Alabama

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama -30.8

PROJECTED TOTAL166.8

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -9900

Alabama

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTSA 68

Projected Total166.8

Projected ScoreAlabama 99

Team Comparison

UTSAMetricAlabama

30.5MMH Power Index69.5

99.0Offensive Efficiency121.6

115.0Defensive Efficiency111.2

-16.0Net Efficiency10.4

-1.2Strength of Schedule9.4

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5

70.2Tempo74.7

45.9%Effective FG%54.9%

17.0%Turnover Rate13.0%

30.9%Offensive Rebound %32.1%

29.9%Free Throw Rate36.9%

-11.3Average Margin7.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY99.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–30.5), offensive efficiency (121.6–99.0), defensive efficiency (111.2–115.0), net efficiency (10.4–-16.0).

Final

UTSA

55—97

Alabama

Alabama by 42 • 77.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTSATEAM STATAlabama

20-61FG32-82

33.0%FG%39.0%

8-333PT16-57

24.0%3PT%28.0%

7-16FT17-20

44.0%FT%85.0%

41Rebounds57

9Offensive Rebounds19

8Assists22

18Turnovers5

4Steals15

3Blocks6

17Fouls15

Player Box Score

UTSA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jamir Simpson	G	27	7-17	2-8	4-5	7	0	1	0	20
Dorian Hayes	G	33	4-8	4-8	0-0	5	0	1	1	12
Austin Nunez	G	31	2-11	1-6	2-2	2	4	0	0	7
Kaidon Rayfield	F	22	3-6	0-1	0-5	5	1	0	0	6
Brent Moss	G	25	1-9	1-8	0-0	3	1	1	0	3
Daniel Akitoby	F	8	1-1	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	3
Macaleab Rich	G	7	1-3	0-1	0-2	2	0	1	0	2
Mo Njie	C	6	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Baboucarr Njie	F	25	0-2	0-0	0-0	5	2	0	2	0
Matheo Coffi	F	16	0-2	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	0

Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jalil Bethea	G	22	6-12	5-10	4-4	6	2	2	0	21
Labaron Philon Jr.	G	22	7-11	3-6	3-4	7	6	4	0	20
London Jemison	F	18	6-10	2-6	6-7	2	0	2	0	20
Amari Allen	F	33	5-13	1-6	0-0	10	4	2	1	11
Latrell Wrightsell	G	21	4-18	2-14	0-0	3	4	1	0	10
Davion Hannah	G	23	2-5	2-5	3-4	8	2	1	0	9
Aiden Sherrell	F	20	1-6	1-4	0-0	11	1	0	3	3
Jacob Martin	F	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	2
Houston Mallette	G	23	0-5	0-5	1-1	3	3	3	0	1
Noah Williamson	C	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	0
Preston Murphy Jr.	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

77.6Possessions77.6

70.9Offensive Efficiency125.0

125.0Defensive Efficiency70.9

-54.1Net Efficiency54.1

39.3%Effective FG%48.8%

40.1%True Shooting %53.0%

23.2%Turnover Rate6.5%

26.2%Free Throw Rate24.4%

54.1%3-Point Rate69.5%

0.44Assist / Turnover4.40

Game Summary

Alabama won by 42 points. The game played at approximately 77.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.