Creighton

15-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

8.8%Creighton

91.2%Nebraska

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNebraska -16.0

PROJECTED TOTAL148.1

MODEL MONEYLINENebraska -1036

Nebraska

28-7

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCreighton 66

Projected Total148.1

Projected ScoreNebraska 82

Team Comparison

CreightonMetricNebraska

50.6MMH Power Index67

109.0Offensive Efficiency114.4

109.5Defensive Efficiency98.3

-0.5Net Efficiency16.1

5.1Strength of Schedule6.1

-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8

68.9Tempo67.3

53.0%Effective FG%55.6%

16.6%Turnover Rate14.4%

26.6%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

29.0%Free Throw Rate26.9%

-0.3Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Nebraska HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–50.6), offensive efficiency (114.4–109.0), defensive efficiency (98.3–109.5), net efficiency (16.1–-0.5).

Creighton COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (26.6–26.3), free throw rate (29.0–26.9).

Final

Creighton

50—71

Nebraska

Nebraska by 21 • 63.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CreightonTEAM STATNebraska

16-52FG24-55

31.0%FG%44.0%

8-333PT10-27

24.0%3PT%37.0%

10-17FT13-20

59.0%FT%65.0%

35Rebounds39

9Offensive Rebounds8

9Assists11

12Turnovers8

2Steals7

3Blocks2

19Fouls14

Player Box Score

Creighton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Austin Swartz	G	23	7-15	2-8	0-0	5	1	2	0	16
Josh Dix	G	32	2-5	2-4	3-4	2	0	0	0	9
Nik Graves	G	23	1-7	1-5	6-7	2	2	0	0	9
Isaac Traudt	F	21	2-8	2-7	0-0	5	1	0	0	6
Fedor Zugic	G	12	2-6	1-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Jasen Green	F	32	1-5	0-2	0-1	6	3	0	1	2
Ty Davis	G	17	1-2	0-1	0-1	2	2	0	0	2
Blake Harper	G	15	0-3	0-2	1-2	4	0	0	0	1
Owen Freeman	F	16	0-1	0-0	0-2	4	0	0	0	0
Kerem Konan	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2	0
Shane Thomas	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Nebraska

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rienk Mast	F	31	6-12	3-5	5-5	5	2	1	0	20
Sam Hoiberg	G	31	6-10	2-4	1-3	3	5	1	0	15
Pryce Sandfort	F	34	5-7	2-4	1-1	7	1	3	0	13
Jamarques Lawrence	G	27	3-8	2-6	0-0	3	3	1	0	8
Braden Frager	F	21	2-6	1-2	2-3	1	0	0	0	7
Berke Buyuktuncel	F	29	1-6	0-2	4-8	13	0	1	1	6
Cale Jacobsen	G	19	1-3	0-1	0-0	4	0	0	0	2
Jared Garcia	F	5	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Leo Curtis	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Justin Bolis	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Kendall Blue	G	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.8Possessions63.8

78.4Offensive Efficiency111.3

111.3Defensive Efficiency78.4

-32.9Net Efficiency32.9

38.5%Effective FG%52.7%

41.6%True Shooting %55.0%

19.0%Turnover Rate12.4%

32.7%Free Throw Rate36.4%

63.5%3-Point Rate49.1%

0.75Assist / Turnover1.38

Game Summary

Nebraska won by 21 points. The game played at approximately 63.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.