
Clemson
24-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
27.8%Clemson
72.2%BYU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBYU -6.8
PROJECTED TOTAL148.7
MODEL MONEYLINEBYU -260

BYU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreClemson 71
Projected Total148.7
Projected ScoreBYU 78
Team Comparison
59.9MMH Power Index63.9
112.6Offensive Efficiency118.3
101.4Defensive Efficiency106.8
11.2Net Efficiency11.5
4.6Strength of Schedule6.5
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.2
63.6Tempo70.6
53.0%Effective FG%54.7%
14.0%Turnover Rate15.2%
27.0%Offensive Rebound %33.7%
38.1%Free Throw Rate35.4%
7.2Average Margin8.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
BYU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY72.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBYU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–59.9), offensive efficiency (118.3–112.6), net efficiency (11.5–11.2), strength of schedule (6.5–4.6).
Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–106.8), ball security (14.0–15.2), free throw rate (38.1–35.4).