Marquette

12-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

5.5%Marquette

94.5%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -18.4

PROJECTED TOTAL154.3

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -1718

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMarquette 68

Projected Total154.3

Projected ScorePurdue 86

Team Comparison

MarquetteMetricPurdue

52.3MMH Power Index73.2

106.0Offensive Efficiency124.8

106.9Defensive Efficiency107.8

-0.9Net Efficiency17.0

4.2Strength of Schedule7.6

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

70.9Tempo65.4

50.5%Effective FG%57.8%

16.0%Turnover Rate13.7%

29.3%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

33.8%Free Throw Rate29.1%

-0.6Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–52.3), offensive efficiency (124.8–106.0), net efficiency (17.0–-0.9), strength of schedule (7.6–4.2).

Marquette COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.9–107.8), free throw rate (33.8–29.1).

Final

Marquette

59—79

Purdue

Purdue by 20 • 65.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MarquetteTEAM STATPurdue

20-61FG30-56

33.0%FG%54.0%

8-313PT7-23

26.0%3PT%30.0%

11-15FT12-15

73.0%FT%80.0%

29Rebounds38

15Offensive Rebounds12

14Assists20

12Turnovers14

8Steals6

3Blocks5

17Fouls17

Player Box Score

Marquette

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Royce Parham	F	27	7-15	3-6	2-2	3	0	0	0	19
Chase Ross	G	28	3-9	1-3	3-4	4	3	1	0	10
Michael Phillips II	F	9	2-3	2-3	2-2	2	0	0	1	8
Ben Gold	F	26	3-9	1-5	0-0	5	0	1	1	7
Caedin Hamilton	F	20	2-3	0-0	2-4	4	1	2	0	6
Adrien Stevens	G	19	2-4	1-3	1-1	3	0	1	0	6
Damarius Owens	F	10	1-3	0-2	1-2	3	1	1	1	3
Nigel James Jr.	G	20	0-6	0-2	0-0	2	4	2	0	0
Sean Jones	G	20	0-5	0-4	0-0	0	5	0	0	0
Zaide Lowery	G	13	0-4	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Joshua Clark	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Tre Norman	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Oscar Cluff	C	23	9-9	0-0	4-4	11	1	2	2	22
Fletcher Loyer	G	28	5-9	4-8	1-1	0	1	1	0	15
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	26	3-7	0-0	4-4	9	1	0	1	10
Braden Smith	G	31	3-6	0-2	1-2	5	10	2	0	7
Omer Mayer	G	16	2-5	1-4	2-4	1	2	0	0	7
C.J. Cox	G	22	2-5	1-3	0-0	0	2	0	0	5
Jack Benter	G	12	2-3	1-1	0-0	3	1	1	0	5
Gicarri Harris	G	18	2-4	0-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	4
Daniel Jacobsen	C	16	2-7	0-2	0-0	2	1	0	2	4
Liam Murphy	F	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Aaron Fine	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jack Lusk	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jace Rayl	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.1Possessions65.1

90.6Offensive Efficiency121.4

121.4Defensive Efficiency90.6

-30.7Net Efficiency30.7

39.3%Effective FG%59.8%

43.3%True Shooting %62.6%

18.4%Turnover Rate21.5%

24.6%Free Throw Rate26.8%

50.8%3-Point Rate41.1%

1.17Assist / Turnover1.43

Game Summary

Purdue won by 20 points. The game played at approximately 65.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.