Nebraska logo

Nebraska

28-7
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.3%Nebraska
82.7%Illinois
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADIllinois -10.1
PROJECTED TOTAL148.9
MODEL MONEYLINEIllinois -478
Illinois logo

Illinois

28-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNebraska 69
Projected Total148.9
Projected ScoreIllinois 80

Team Comparison

67MMH Power Index76.5
114.4Offensive Efficiency125.0
98.3Defensive Efficiency103.3
16.1Net Efficiency21.7
6.1Strength of Schedule6.7
6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency12.7
67.3Tempo66.5
55.6%Effective FG%54.8%
14.4%Turnover Rate13.1%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %39.3%
26.9%Free Throw Rate33.8%
10.8Average Margin14.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Illinois HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMIllinois holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.5–67.0), offensive efficiency (125.0–114.4), net efficiency (21.7–16.1), strength of schedule (6.7–6.1).
Nebraska COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.3–103.3), shooting efficiency (55.6–54.8).
Final
Nebraska logo
Nebraska
83—80
Illinois logo
Illinois
Nebraska by 3 • 63.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NebraskaTEAM STATIllinois
32-62FG28-58
52.0%FG%48.0%
12-263PT10-29
46.0%3PT%34.0%
7-8FT14-20
88.0%FT%70.0%
27Rebounds34
8Offensive Rebounds13
20Assists18
6Turnovers8
6Steals2
2Blocks4
21Fouls9

Player Box Score

Nebraska
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Pryce SandfortF3412-186-112-213100032
Rienk MastF347-153-60-072100017
Jamarques LawrenceG315-82-42-236100014
Jared GarciaF134-80-22-241000010
Sam HoibergG303-61-10-05600007
Berke BuyuktuncelF261-40-11-23132003
Cale JacobsenG160-20-00-01100000
Braden FragerF130-10-10-02000000
Kendall BlueG30-00-00-00000000
Illinois
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kylan BoswellG375-93-67-933000020
Keaton WaglerG406-134-83-3110110019
Andrej StojakovicG278-160-33-3101010019
Zvonimir IvisicC113-50-11-23000007
Jake DavisF172-51-40-13100005
David MirkovicF232-40-10-12100004
Tomislav IvisicC291-31-30-15212003
Ben HumrichousF161-31-30-03000003

Advanced Game Stats

63.2Possessions63.2
131.3Offensive Efficiency126.6
126.6Defensive Efficiency131.3
4.7Net Efficiency-4.7
61.3%Effective FG%56.9%
63.1%True Shooting %59.3%
9.4%Turnover Rate12.8%
12.9%Free Throw Rate34.5%
41.9%3-Point Rate50.0%
3.33Assist / Turnover2.25
Game Summary
Nebraska won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 63.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.