UCLA logo

UCLA

24-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.9%UCLA
88.1%Gonzaga
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGonzaga -14.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.3
MODEL MONEYLINEGonzaga -740
Gonzaga logo

Gonzaga

31-4
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUCLA 68
Projected Total151.3
Projected ScoreGonzaga 83

Team Comparison

63MMH Power Index76.4
115.9Offensive Efficiency119.7
106.9Defensive Efficiency94.0
9.0Net Efficiency25.7
5.1Strength of Schedule3.0
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency18.2
66.5Tempo70.4
53.5%Effective FG%55.7%
13.4%Turnover Rate13.6%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
33.8%Free Throw Rate31.5%
6.0Average Margin18.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Gonzaga HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY88.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGonzaga holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.4–63.0), offensive efficiency (119.7–115.9), defensive efficiency (94.0–106.9), net efficiency (25.7–9.0).
UCLA COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.1–3.0), ball security (13.4–13.6), free throw rate (33.8–31.5).
Final
UCLA logo
UCLA
72—82
Gonzaga logo
Gonzaga
Gonzaga by 10 • 65.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UCLATEAM STATGonzaga
25-51FG28-56
49.0%FG%50.0%
7-153PT6-16
47.0%3PT%38.0%
15-19FT20-32
79.0%FT%63.0%
29Rebounds36
6Offensive Rebounds12
15Assists13
10Turnovers8
5Steals5
9Blocks1
22Fouls16

Player Box Score

UCLA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tyler BilodeauF347-134-66-740020024
Donovan DentG353-60-06-8210230012
Xavier BookerF266-120-00-050020012
Skyy ClarkG343-62-50-05200008
Eric Dailey Jr.G353-80-20-05112006
Brandon WilliamsG52-30-00-00010004
Trent PerryG130-20-13-42100003
Jamar BrownG121-11-10-01100003
Steven Jamerson IIF60-00-00-03010000
Gonzaga
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Graham IkeF369-161-26-955000025
Braden HuffF247-121-26-840000021
Mario Saint-SuperyG284-61-23-341100012
Adam MillerG233-32-21-22020009
Tyon Grant-FosterG183-70-21-22110007
Jalen WarleyG211-50-02-67211004
Braeden SmithG131-21-20-02200003
Steele VentersG160-20-21-21100001
Emmanuel InnocentiF210-30-20-04100000

Advanced Game Stats

65.6Possessions65.6
109.8Offensive Efficiency125.0
125.0Defensive Efficiency109.8
-15.2Net Efficiency15.2
55.9%Effective FG%55.4%
60.0%True Shooting %57.6%
15.6%Turnover Rate11.9%
37.3%Free Throw Rate57.1%
29.4%3-Point Rate28.6%
1.50Assist / Turnover1.63
Game Summary
Gonzaga won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 65.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.