
Incarnate Word
12-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.1%Incarnate Word
89.9%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -14.2
PROJECTED TOTAL150.5
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -890

TCU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreIncarnate Word 68
Projected Total150.5
Projected ScoreTCU 82
Team Comparison
44.6MMH Power Index59.7
112.0Offensive Efficiency110.2
111.2Defensive Efficiency102.7
0.8Net Efficiency7.5
-3.6Strength of Schedule4.6
-8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
66.3Tempo70.2
52.2%Effective FG%50.5%
16.8%Turnover Rate15.3%
34.4%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
34.0%Free Throw Rate38.3%
0.5Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
TCU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY89.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTCU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.7–44.6), defensive efficiency (102.7–111.2), net efficiency (7.5–0.8), strength of schedule (4.6–-3.6).
Incarnate Word COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.0–110.2), shooting efficiency (52.2–50.5), offensive rebounding (34.4–33.6).