Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.4%Lipscomb

98.6%Duke

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADDuke -27.0

PROJECTED TOTAL149.4

MODEL MONEYLINEDuke -7043

Duke

35-3

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 61

Projected Total149.4

Projected ScoreDuke 88

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricDuke

47.9MMH Power Index81.7

111.3Offensive Efficiency122.2

107.6Defensive Efficiency95.2

3.7Net Efficiency27.0

-2.5Strength of Schedule7.8

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency18.7

68.8Tempo66.8

54.8%Effective FG%56.9%

16.0%Turnover Rate15.9%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %38.2%

26.5%Free Throw Rate39.0%

2.5Average Margin18.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Duke HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuke holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (81.7–47.9), offensive efficiency (122.2–111.3), defensive efficiency (95.2–107.6), net efficiency (27.0–3.7).

Final

Lipscomb

73—97

Duke

Duke by 24 • 82.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATDuke

24-61FG36-69

39.0%FG%52.0%

7-233PT8-25

30.0%3PT%32.0%

18-20FT17-22

90.0%FT%77.0%

21Rebounds55

3Offensive Rebounds20

14Assists21

16Turnovers22

12Steals14

2Blocks4

19Fouls17

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Grant Asman	F	30	7-13	2-4	2-2	5	1	3	0	18
Titas Sargiunas	F	32	5-9	2-5	2-3	2	2	1	0	14
Mateo Esmeraldo	G	30	3-13	0-4	8-9	4	8	2	0	14
Charlie Williams	C	20	3-7	1-2	4-4	0	1	0	0	11
Ross Candelino	G	22	2-6	2-4	0-0	3	0	1	0	6
Kellan Boylan	F	10	1-2	0-0	2-2	1	1	2	2	4
Or Ashkenazi	F	23	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	1	3	0	2
Kennedy Okpara	F	17	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Ethan Duncan	G	16	1-6	0-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	2

Duke

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cameron Boozer	F	30	10-17	0-3	6-6	13	3	1	0	26
Isaiah Evans	G	27	5-10	4-7	2-3	2	3	2	1	16
Darren Harris	G	22	3-6	2-5	3-4	1	2	2	0	11
Maliq Brown	F	21	5-6	0-0	1-2	9	2	2	0	11
Patrick Ngongba II	C	24	5-9	0-0	0-0	11	1	2	2	10
Cayden Boozer	G	22	4-6	1-2	0-0	2	4	2	0	9
Caleb Foster	G	26	2-6	0-2	4-4	6	2	0	1	8
Dame Sarr	G	14	2-6	1-3	1-3	5	3	1	0	6
Nikolas Khamenia	G	14	0-3	0-3	0-0	3	1	2	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

82.5Possessions82.5

88.5Offensive Efficiency117.6

117.6Defensive Efficiency88.5

-29.1Net Efficiency29.1

45.1%Effective FG%58.0%

51.8%True Shooting %61.0%

19.2%Turnover Rate27.0%

32.8%Free Throw Rate31.9%

37.7%3-Point Rate36.2%

0.88Assist / Turnover0.95

Game Summary

Duke won by 24 points. The game played at approximately 82.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.