
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.8%Queens University
92.2%Arkansas
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADArkansas -16.8
PROJECTED TOTAL176.5
MODEL MONEYLINEArkansas -1182

Arkansas
28-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 80
Projected Total176.5
Projected ScoreArkansas 97
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index69.3
118.4Offensive Efficiency122.2
117.0Defensive Efficiency109.8
1.4Net Efficiency12.4
0.1Strength of Schedule8.6
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency3.4
71.4Tempo73.8
56.6%Effective FG%56.4%
14.8%Turnover Rate12.2%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
37.6%Free Throw Rate36.5%
0.9Average Margin9.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Arkansas HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY92.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArkansas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.3–51.7), offensive efficiency (122.2–118.4), defensive efficiency (109.8–117.0), net efficiency (12.4–1.4).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (56.6–56.4), free throw rate (37.6–36.5).