Radford logo

Radford

16-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.7%Radford
76.3%William & Mary
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -8.2
PROJECTED TOTAL165.2
MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -322
William & Mary logo

William & Mary

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRadford 78
Projected Total165.2
Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 87

Team Comparison

47.9MMH Power Index53.8
110.9Offensive Efficiency112.5
107.4Defensive Efficiency105.2
3.5Net Efficiency7.3
-4.6Strength of Schedule-1.5
2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5
73.4Tempo73.9
52.6%Effective FG%55.3%
17.0%Turnover Rate16.4%
31.4%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
41.0%Free Throw Rate45.3%
2.5Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–47.9), offensive efficiency (112.5–110.9), defensive efficiency (105.2–107.4), net efficiency (7.3–3.5).
Radford COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.4–26.7).
Final
Radford logo
Radford
83—96
William & Mary logo
William & Mary
William & Mary by 13 • 80.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RadfordTEAM STATWilliam & Mary
27-69FG32-66
39.0%FG%48.0%
14-423PT5-21
33.0%3PT%24.0%
15-22FT27-31
68.0%FT%87.0%
37Rebounds41
13Offensive Rebounds12
18Assists14
15Turnovers11
10Steals9
6Blocks4
21Fouls20

Player Box Score

Radford
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dennis Parker Jr.G368-205-115-6113310026
Jaylon JohnsonG336-144-113-434200019
Lukas WallsG243-63-65-811100014
Del JonesG384-142-82-249110012
Tyson BrownF282-30-00-15013004
Mari JordanG132-40-20-06000004
Frederik ErichsenF102-50-20-02010004
Brennan Rigsby Jr.G170-30-20-12111000
Louie JordanF10-00-00-00000000
William & Mary
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kyle PulliamG276-71-19-1071300022
Reese MillerG286-132-73-333100017
Chase LoweG273-60-06-765000012
Jo'el EmanuelF283-61-23-320000010
Kilian BrockhoffF224-121-61-160020010
Finn LallyF125-70-00-021010010
Jhei-R JonesG142-20-03-32010007
Tunde Vahlberg FasasiF171-70-22-24320004
Ryan Jackson Jr.G82-30-00-23021004
Cade HaskinsF170-30-30-04100000

Advanced Game Stats

80.6Possessions80.6
103.0Offensive Efficiency119.1
119.1Defensive Efficiency103.0
-16.1Net Efficiency16.1
49.3%Effective FG%52.3%
52.2%True Shooting %59.5%
18.4%Turnover Rate13.8%
31.9%Free Throw Rate47.0%
60.9%3-Point Rate31.8%
1.20Assist / Turnover1.27
Game Summary
William & Mary won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 80.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.