Auburn

21-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

18.4%Auburn

81.6%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -10.6

PROJECTED TOTAL160.7

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -443

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAuburn 75

Projected Total160.7

Projected ScorePurdue 86

Team Comparison

AuburnMetricPurdue

64.4MMH Power Index73.2

118.8Offensive Efficiency124.8

113.0Defensive Efficiency107.8

5.8Net Efficiency17.0

7.5Strength of Schedule7.6

8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

69.8Tempo65.4

53.1%Effective FG%57.8%

14.5%Turnover Rate13.7%

36.5%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

43.8%Free Throw Rate29.1%

4.1Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–64.4), offensive efficiency (124.8–118.8), defensive efficiency (107.8–113.0), net efficiency (17.0–5.8).

Auburn COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (36.5–36.2), free throw rate (43.8–29.1).

Final

Auburn

60—88

Purdue

Purdue by 28 • 65.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

AuburnTEAM STATPurdue

21-58FG33-59

36.0%FG%56.0%

7-253PT12-26

28.0%3PT%46.0%

11-16FT10-10

69.0%FT%100.0%

25Rebounds36

11Offensive Rebounds9

13Assists21

10Turnovers11

7Steals7

1Blocks5

14Fouls14

Player Box Score

Auburn

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kevin Overton	G	36	8-18	4-11	2-4	5	2	1	0	22
Keyshawn Hall	F	35	5-11	2-6	2-2	3	2	0	0	14
KeShawn Murphy	F	26	2-4	0-0	2-4	4	2	1	1	6
Elyjah Freeman	G	22	1-6	0-2	4-4	3	3	1	0	6
Tahaad Pettiford	G	25	2-7	1-5	0-0	2	1	1	0	5
Filip Jovic	F	21	1-5	0-0	1-2	3	0	0	0	3
Sebastian Williams-Adams	F	20	1-4	0-0	0-0	1	1	2	0	2
Kaden Magwood	G	15	1-3	0-1	0-0	0	2	1	0	2

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	29	9-13	0-0	0-0	6	1	1	0	18
C.J. Cox	G	24	5-8	4-7	0-0	1	1	0	0	14
Gicarri Harris	G	16	4-7	4-6	0-0	4	0	0	0	12
Braden Smith	G	35	2-5	1-3	6-6	5	14	3	1	11
Jack Benter	G	11	4-4	3-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	11
Fletcher Loyer	G	29	2-10	0-7	4-4	3	1	1	1	8
Oscar Cluff	C	22	3-6	0-0	0-0	7	1	0	0	6
Daniel Jacobsen	C	18	2-3	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	3	4
Omer Mayer	G	13	2-3	0-0	0-0	2	2	2	0	4
Liam Murphy	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.2Possessions65.2

92.0Offensive Efficiency135.0

135.0Defensive Efficiency92.0

-42.9Net Efficiency42.9

42.2%Effective FG%66.1%

45.7%True Shooting %69.0%

15.5%Turnover Rate16.7%

27.6%Free Throw Rate16.9%

43.1%3-Point Rate44.1%

1.30Assist / Turnover1.91

Game Summary

Purdue won by 28 points. The game played at approximately 65.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.