Kennesaw State logo

Kennesaw State

21-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.4%Kennesaw State
88.6%Alabama
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAlabama -12.4
PROJECTED TOTAL172.3
MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -777
Alabama logo

Alabama

24-10
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKennesaw State 80
Projected Total172.3
Projected ScoreAlabama 92

Team Comparison

55.7MMH Power Index69.5
113.6Offensive Efficiency121.6
104.3Defensive Efficiency111.2
9.3Net Efficiency10.4
-2.8Strength of Schedule9.4
4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5
72.9Tempo74.7
52.2%Effective FG%54.9%
16.3%Turnover Rate13.0%
35.7%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
44.9%Free Throw Rate36.9%
6.8Average Margin7.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY88.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–55.7), offensive efficiency (121.6–113.6), net efficiency (10.4–9.3), strength of schedule (9.4–-2.8).
Kennesaw State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.3–111.2), offensive rebounding (35.7–32.1), free throw rate (44.9–36.9).
Final
Kennesaw State logo
Kennesaw State
81—92
Alabama logo
Alabama
Alabama by 11 • 78.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Kennesaw StateTEAM STATAlabama
30-69FG32-73
43.0%FG%44.0%
7-233PT10-31
30.0%3PT%32.0%
14-18FT18-23
78.0%FT%78.0%
46Rebounds41
15Offensive Rebounds13
13Assists17
16Turnovers8
5Steals8
4Blocks7
19Fouls16

Player Box Score

Kennesaw State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Simeon CottleG316-154-94-521100020
RJ JohnsonG186-112-32-232000016
Braedan LueF316-140-20-0104110012
Frankquon ShermanF245-70-22-4111220012
Ramone SealsF172-60-36-780000010
Amir TaylorF192-41-10-03100005
Darius Washington IIIG172-50-10-03000004
Trey SimpsonF261-50-20-03000002
Kaden RickardG170-20-00-01411000
Alabama
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Aiden SherrellF248-101-14-771020021
Labaron Philon Jr.G277-162-61-226400017
Aden HollowayG274-103-76-612000017
Jalil BetheaG184-71-32-242010011
Amari AllenF262-51-34-48212009
Latrell WrightsellG213-140-60-03210006
Keitenn BristowF142-40-11-22121005
Houston MalletteG261-21-20-06000003
Taylor Bol BowenF131-41-20-02100003
Noah WilliamsonC40-10-00-00001000

Advanced Game Stats

78.8Possessions78.8
102.8Offensive Efficiency116.8
116.8Defensive Efficiency102.8
-14.0Net Efficiency14.0
48.6%Effective FG%50.7%
52.2%True Shooting %54.8%
20.4%Turnover Rate10.1%
26.1%Free Throw Rate31.5%
33.3%3-Point Rate42.5%
0.81Assist / Turnover2.13
Game Summary
Alabama won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 78.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.