
Kennesaw State
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.4%Kennesaw State
88.6%Alabama
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAlabama -12.4
PROJECTED TOTAL172.3
MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -777

Alabama
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKennesaw State 80
Projected Total172.3
Projected ScoreAlabama 92
Team Comparison
55.7MMH Power Index69.5
113.6Offensive Efficiency121.6
104.3Defensive Efficiency111.2
9.3Net Efficiency10.4
-2.8Strength of Schedule9.4
4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5
72.9Tempo74.7
52.2%Effective FG%54.9%
16.3%Turnover Rate13.0%
35.7%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
44.9%Free Throw Rate36.9%
6.8Average Margin7.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Alabama HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY88.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–55.7), offensive efficiency (121.6–113.6), net efficiency (10.4–9.3), strength of schedule (9.4–-2.8).
Kennesaw State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.3–111.2), offensive rebounding (35.7–32.1), free throw rate (44.9–36.9).