
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
1.9%Colgate
98.1%Florida
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFlorida -25.4
PROJECTED TOTAL157.9
MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida -5163

Florida
27-8MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 66
Projected Total157.9
Projected ScoreFlorida 92
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index79.7
111.7Offensive Efficiency120.9
109.0Defensive Efficiency99.3
2.7Net Efficiency21.6
-2.0Strength of Schedule7.1
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency24.2
68.4Tempo72.0
54.5%Effective FG%54.2%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.3%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %42.8%
30.0%Free Throw Rate39.8%
1.8Average Margin15.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Florida HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY98.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFlorida holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (79.7–48.8), offensive efficiency (120.9–111.7), defensive efficiency (99.3–109.0), net efficiency (21.6–2.7).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (54.5–54.2), ball security (14.8–16.3).