Gonzaga

31-4

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

97.7%Gonzaga

2.3%Pepperdine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGonzaga -23.7

PROJECTED TOTAL153.4

MODEL MONEYLINEGonzaga -4248

Pepperdine

9-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGonzaga 89

Projected Total153.4

Projected ScorePepperdine 65

Team Comparison

GonzagaMetricPepperdine

76.4MMH Power Index38.2

119.7Offensive Efficiency103.2

94.0Defensive Efficiency113.6

25.7Net Efficiency-10.4

3.0Strength of Schedule0.7

18.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

70.4Tempo70.0

55.7%Effective FG%48.7%

13.6%Turnover Rate18.3%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %31.1%

31.5%Free Throw Rate34.0%

18.1Average Margin-7.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Gonzaga HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY97.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGonzaga holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.4–38.2), offensive efficiency (119.7–103.2), defensive efficiency (94.0–113.6), net efficiency (25.7–-10.4).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (34.0–31.5).

Final

Gonzaga

96—56

Pepperdine

Gonzaga by 40 • 70.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GonzagaTEAM STATPepperdine

36-67FG19-56

54.0%FG%34.0%

10-223PT5-19

45.0%3PT%26.0%

14-19FT13-20

74.0%FT%65.0%

44Rebounds31

13Offensive Rebounds10

21Assists11

9Turnovers14

8Steals6

7Blocks2

21Fouls13

Player Box Score

Gonzaga

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyon Grant-Foster	G	20	6-7	2-2	4-6	2	0	1	4	18
Braeden Smith	G	18	6-8	2-2	1-1	5	8	0	0	15
Davis Fogle	G	16	5-7	2-3	3-3	2	0	1	0	15
Graham Ike	F	23	6-9	0-1	1-2	10	2	0	1	13
Braden Huff	F	27	5-7	0-0	0-0	3	4	1	1	10
Steele Venters	G	15	3-6	2-5	0-0	1	0	1	0	8
Mario Saint-Supery	G	18	1-7	1-2	2-2	4	4	1	0	5
Jalen Warley	G	14	1-2	0-0	2-3	5	3	1	0	4
Adam Miller	G	18	1-8	1-4	0-0	1	0	1	1	3
Ismaila Diagne	C	8	1-1	0-0	1-2	7	0	0	0	3
Emmanuel Innocenti	F	19	1-5	0-3	0-0	2	0	1	0	2
Cade Orness	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Joaquim ArauzMoore	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Yonatan Levy	F	27	3-6	2-3	7-9	6	0	3	1	15
Javon Cooley	G	25	6-8	1-3	0-0	2	1	0	0	13
Danilo Dožic	C	30	2-6	2-4	2-2	0	1	0	1	8
Styles Phipps	G	33	1-8	0-1	4-6	7	3	2	0	6
Aaron Clark	G	33	2-14	0-6	0-1	5	3	0	0	4
Stefan Cicic	C	13	2-6	0-0	0-2	6	0	1	0	4
Pavle Stošic	F	15	1-4	0-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	2
David Mager	G	9	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Luka Vudragovic	G	8	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Vladimir Sudar	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Pasha Shemirani	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.8Possessions70.8

135.6Offensive Efficiency79.1

79.1Defensive Efficiency135.6

56.5Net Efficiency-56.5

61.2%Effective FG%38.4%

63.1%True Shooting %42.7%

12.5%Turnover Rate20.1%

28.4%Free Throw Rate35.7%

32.8%3-Point Rate33.9%

2.33Assist / Turnover0.79

Game Summary

Gonzaga won by 40 points. The game played at approximately 70.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.