Kent State

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

7.1%Kent State

92.9%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -15.8

PROJECTED TOTAL162.3

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -1308

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreKent State 73

Projected Total162.3

Projected ScorePurdue 89

Team Comparison

Kent StateMetricPurdue

54.7MMH Power Index73.2

113.9Offensive Efficiency124.8

107.6Defensive Efficiency107.8

6.3Net Efficiency17.0

-0.1Strength of Schedule7.6

2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

74.0Tempo65.4

53.0%Effective FG%57.8%

17.7%Turnover Rate13.7%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

43.5%Free Throw Rate29.1%

4.7Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–54.7), offensive efficiency (124.8–113.9), net efficiency (17.0–6.3), strength of schedule (7.6–-0.1).

Kent State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–107.8), free throw rate (43.5–29.1).

Final

Kent State

60—101

Purdue

Purdue by 41 • 75.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Kent StateTEAM STATPurdue

21-61FG36-64

34.0%FG%56.0%

7-273PT12-31

26.0%3PT%39.0%

11-14FT17-19

79.0%FT%89.0%

28Rebounds40

6Offensive Rebounds6

13Assists25

15Turnovers8

5Steals10

4Blocks—

21Fouls14

Player Box Score

Kent State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Morgan Safford	G	32	4-11	2-5	0-0	2	1	0	0	10
Jahari Williamson	G	29	3-7	2-5	2-3	4	1	1	0	10
Delrecco Gillespie	F	27	3-7	1-3	2-2	4	1	3	1	9
Quinn Woidke	G	25	4-13	1-8	0-0	4	2	0	0	9
Rob Whaley Jr.	F	27	1-6	0-2	4-5	3	3	1	1	6
Omer Hamama	G	12	1-4	0-1	2-2	3	1	0	0	4
Dezmon Briscoe	F	7	1-2	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	1	3
Brenden Moss	G	3	1-1	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Rayvon Griffith	F	17	1-4	0-1	0-0	0	3	0	0	2
Magnus Entenmann	F	13	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	1	2
Deandre Jones	F	1	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Landon Vanderwarker	F	7	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Jack Benter	G	16	7-7	6-6	0-0	5	1	1	20
Fletcher Loyer	G	23	7-15	3-10	2-2	1	2	2	19
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	21	7-11	1-2	0-1	12	2	1	15
Braden Smith	G	27	6-9	0-2	0-0	4	8	2	12
Daniel Jacobsen	C	22	2-3	0-0	7-7	4	1	0	11
Gicarri Harris	G	21	1-4	1-4	6-6	5	2	3	9
Oscar Cluff	C	18	2-2	0-0	2-3	3	2	0	6
C.J. Cox	G	16	2-3	0-1	0-0	2	1	1	4
Omer Mayer	G	16	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	5	0	3
Aaron Fine	G	3	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2
Liam Murphy	F	11	0-4	0-3	0-0	0	1	0	0
Jack Lusk	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0
Jace Rayl	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

75.9Possessions75.9

79.1Offensive Efficiency133.1

133.1Defensive Efficiency79.1

-54.0Net Efficiency54.0

40.2%Effective FG%65.6%

44.3%True Shooting %69.2%

19.6%Turnover Rate10.7%

23.0%Free Throw Rate29.7%

44.3%3-Point Rate48.4%

0.87Assist / Turnover3.13

Game Summary

Purdue won by 41 points. The game played at approximately 75.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.