Queens University

21-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.7%Queens University

87.3%Auburn

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAuburn -12.5

PROJECTED TOTAL170.6

MODEL MONEYLINEAuburn -687

Auburn

21-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQueens University 79

Projected Total170.6

Projected ScoreAuburn 92

Team Comparison

Queens UniversityMetricAuburn

51.7MMH Power Index64.4

118.4Offensive Efficiency118.8

117.0Defensive Efficiency113.0

1.4Net Efficiency5.8

0.1Strength of Schedule7.5

1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0

71.4Tempo69.8

56.6%Effective FG%53.1%

14.8%Turnover Rate14.5%

29.6%Offensive Rebound %36.5%

37.6%Free Throw Rate43.8%

0.9Average Margin4.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Auburn HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAuburn holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.4–51.7), offensive efficiency (118.8–118.4), defensive efficiency (113.0–117.0), net efficiency (5.8–1.4).

Queens University COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (56.6–53.1).

Final

Queens University

65—106

Auburn

Auburn by 41 • 74.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Queens UniversityTEAM STATAuburn

21-56FG35-63

38.0%FG%56.0%

2-153PT15-28

13.0%3PT%54.0%

21-27FT21-30

78.0%FT%70.0%

26Rebounds40

9Offensive Rebounds13

9Assists24

14Turnovers10

3Steals13

3Blocks9

20Fouls18

Player Box Score

Queens University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nasir Mann	G	28	4-10	0-2	5-6	3	1	0	0	13
Jordan Watford	G	19	2-6	0-0	5-6	2	2	0	0	9
Isaiah Henry	G	19	3-6	1-1	2-2	2	0	0	0	9
Avantae Parker	F	8	3-3	1-1	2-3	1	0	0	1	9
Maban Jabriel	F	22	2-9	0-4	3-4	1	0	0	0	7
Gus Larson	F	24	2-5	0-2	2-2	4	1	1	0	6
Kam Clark	F	20	2-5	0-1	2-2	3	1	0	0	6
Yoav Berman	G	26	1-5	0-1	0-2	3	2	2	2	2
Chris Ashby	G	24	1-4	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Reid Celestin	G	10	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	2

Auburn

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Elyjah Freeman	G	23	9-13	4-4	5-5	3	1	1	0	27
Kevin Overton	G	30	8-12	5-7	2-2	2	1	4	0	23
Keyshawn Hall	F	25	6-10	3-6	3-5	5	7	2	2	18
Sebastian Williams-Adams	F	29	4-6	0-1	2-4	5	1	2	3	10
KeShawn Murphy	F	22	3-6	1-2	2-4	6	2	2	3	9
Tahaad Pettiford	G	29	1-8	1-5	2-2	4	9	2	1	5
Filip Jovic	F	18	1-2	0-0	3-4	5	0	0	0	5
Kaden Magwood	G	11	1-2	1-1	2-2	2	3	0	0	5
Simon Walker	G	9	2-4	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Blake Muschalek	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-2	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

74.1Possessions74.1

87.7Offensive Efficiency143.0

143.0Defensive Efficiency87.7

-55.3Net Efficiency55.3

39.3%Effective FG%67.5%

47.2%True Shooting %68.6%

19.0%Turnover Rate13.5%

48.2%Free Throw Rate47.6%

26.8%3-Point Rate44.4%

0.64Assist / Turnover2.40

Game Summary

Auburn won by 41 points. The game played at approximately 74.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.