
Butler
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.2%Butler
56.8%Creighton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCreighton -2.6
PROJECTED TOTAL156.7
MODEL MONEYLINECreighton -131

Creighton
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreButler 77
Projected Total156.7
Projected ScoreCreighton 80
Team Comparison
52.7MMH Power Index50.6
111.7Offensive Efficiency109.0
109.1Defensive Efficiency109.5
2.6Net Efficiency-0.5
3.1Strength of Schedule5.1
-8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
71.1Tempo68.9
51.2%Effective FG%53.0%
15.9%Turnover Rate16.6%
34.4%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
42.9%Free Throw Rate29.0%
1.8Average Margin-0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Butler HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMButler holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–50.6), offensive efficiency (111.7–109.0), defensive efficiency (109.1–109.5), net efficiency (2.6–-0.5).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.1–3.1), recent form (-5.2–-8.5), shooting efficiency (53.0–51.2).