
Louisville
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
59.2%Louisville
40.8%Stanford
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLouisville -2.9
PROJECTED TOTAL155.5
MODEL MONEYLINELouisville -145

Stanford
20-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLouisville 79
Projected Total155.5
Projected ScoreStanford 76
Team Comparison
67.1MMH Power Index59.2
118.6Offensive Efficiency111.6
102.2Defensive Efficiency107.1
16.4Net Efficiency4.5
6.0Strength of Schedule5.2
1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4
71.0Tempo68.1
56.9%Effective FG%51.9%
16.8%Turnover Rate15.5%
32.3%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
34.1%Free Throw Rate37.2%
11.7Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Louisville HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLouisville holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.1–59.2), offensive efficiency (118.6–111.6), defensive efficiency (102.2–107.1), net efficiency (16.4–4.5).
Stanford COUNTERS WITHrecent form (7.4–1.4), ball security (15.5–16.8), offensive rebounding (32.4–32.3).