Alabama

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

39.1%Alabama

60.9%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -4.6

PROJECTED TOTAL173.5

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -156

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama 84

Projected Total173.5

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 89

Team Comparison

AlabamaMetricVanderbilt

69.5MMH Power Index68.9

121.6Offensive Efficiency120.9

111.2Defensive Efficiency105.7

10.4Net Efficiency15.2

9.4Strength of Schedule7.4

9.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

74.7Tempo70.9

54.9%Effective FG%55.3%

13.0%Turnover Rate13.5%

32.1%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

36.9%Free Throw Rate39.3%

7.7Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–68.9), offensive efficiency (121.6–120.9), strength of schedule (9.4–7.4), recent form (9.5–2.7).

Vanderbilt COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.7–111.2), net efficiency (15.2–10.4), shooting efficiency (55.3–54.9).

Final

Alabama

90—96

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 6 • 82.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

AlabamaTEAM STATVanderbilt

26-70FG27-59

37.0%FG%46.0%

9-403PT7-20

22.0%3PT%35.0%

29-38FT35-50

76.0%FT%70.0%

49Rebounds38

18Offensive Rebounds8

9Assists11

13Turnovers8

3Steals9

1Blocks6

35Fouls29

Player Box Score

Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Amari Allen	F	34	6-11	1-3	12-12	11	4	0	0	25
Aden Holloway	G	27	9-18	3-7	1-4	2	1	0	0	22
Labaron Philon Jr.	G	20	5-9	2-5	6-7	1	1	1	0	18
Latrell Wrightsell	G	31	4-12	3-9	2-2	4	1	1	0	13
London Jemison	F	21	1-8	0-6	3-7	11	0	0	0	5
Taylor Bol Bowen	F	23	0-6	0-5	3-4	7	1	1	1	3
Jalil Bethea	G	11	0-3	0-3	2-2	3	1	0	0	2
Keitenn Bristow	F	8	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Houston Mallette	G	21	0-2	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Noah Williamson	C	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Tanner	G	33	8-15	1-4	12-15	3	7	4	0	29
Duke Miles	G	25	5-12	2-5	7-7	4	1	5	0	19
Tyler Nickel	F	27	4-8	1-4	3-4	1	1	0	1	12
Devin McGlockton	F	29	3-4	0-0	4-5	12	1	0	1	10
AK Okereke	F	27	4-5	1-1	1-1	8	1	0	2	10
Jalen Washington	C	20	1-4	0-0	7-10	3	0	0	2	9
Tyler Harris	F	20	1-9	1-5	0-2	3	0	0	0	3
Mike James	G	4	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Chandler Bing	G	15	0-1	0-0	1-6	3	0	0	0	1

Advanced Game Stats

82.9Possessions82.9

108.6Offensive Efficiency115.8

115.8Defensive Efficiency108.6

-7.2Net Efficiency7.2

43.6%Effective FG%51.7%

51.1%True Shooting %58.0%

15.7%Turnover Rate9.7%

54.3%Free Throw Rate84.7%

57.1%3-Point Rate33.9%

0.69Assist / Turnover1.38

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 82.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.