Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

22.8%Texas A&M

77.2%Auburn

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAuburn -7.1

PROJECTED TOTAL162.5

MODEL MONEYLINEAuburn -339

Auburn

21-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 78

Projected Total162.5

Projected ScoreAuburn 85

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricAuburn

58MMH Power Index64.4

116.1Offensive Efficiency118.8

108.4Defensive Efficiency113.0

7.7Net Efficiency5.8

4.8Strength of Schedule7.5

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0

69.1Tempo69.8

53.5%Effective FG%53.1%

14.8%Turnover Rate14.5%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %36.5%

37.5%Free Throw Rate43.8%

5.3Average Margin4.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Auburn HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAuburn holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.4–58.0), offensive efficiency (118.8–116.1), strength of schedule (7.5–4.8), recent form (8.0–-7.2).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.4–113.0), net efficiency (7.7–5.8), shooting efficiency (53.5–53.1).

Final

Texas A&M

90—88

Auburn

Texas A&M by 2 • 73.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATAuburn

32-61FG29-65

52.0%FG%45.0%

13-303PT7-26

43.0%3PT%27.0%

13-20FT23-31

65.0%FT%74.0%

34Rebounds40

12Offensive Rebounds19

14Assists12

14Turnovers13

11Steals5

4Blocks5

21Fouls17

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Pop Isaacs	G	29	7-12	4-8	3-5	2	5	0	1	21
Jacari Lane	G	29	4-9	3-6	6-7	7	0	1	0	17
Rubén Dominguez	G	30	4-8	4-7	2-2	4	2	1	0	14
Rashaun Agee	F	28	6-10	0-3	2-3	7	1	1	1	14
Rylan Griffen	G	31	4-6	1-2	0-0	6	1	3	1	9
Ali Dibba	G	20	4-8	1-2	0-1	5	4	2	0	9
Marcus Hill	G	13	2-5	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	4
Zach Clemence	F	5	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Federiko Federiko	F	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	2	1	0
Josh Holloway	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jamie Vinson	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-2	0	0	0	0	0

Auburn

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Keyshawn Hall	F	37	8-15	3-5	13-16	12	3	0	2	32
Kevin Overton	G	35	6-16	2-7	2-2	3	1	1	0	16
Tahaad Pettiford	G	32	3-9	1-6	4-5	4	2	0	0	11
Sebastian Williams-Adams	F	30	4-6	1-2	2-5	5	2	2	1	11
KeShawn Murphy	F	27	4-8	0-1	0-1	8	1	0	1	8
Elyjah Freeman	G	15	3-6	0-2	2-2	2	1	1	1	8
Simon Walker	G	9	1-3	0-2	0-0	2	1	1	0	2
Kaden Magwood	G	8	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Filip Jovic	F	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.1Possessions73.1

123.1Offensive Efficiency120.4

120.4Defensive Efficiency123.1

2.7Net Efficiency-2.7

63.1%Effective FG%50.0%

63.8%True Shooting %55.2%

19.3%Turnover Rate17.6%

32.8%Free Throw Rate47.7%

49.2%3-Point Rate40.0%

1.00Assist / Turnover0.92

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 73.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.