
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
37.3%Merrimack
62.7%Siena
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSiena -4.8
PROJECTED TOTAL134.0
MODEL MONEYLINESiena -168

Siena
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 65
Projected Total134.0
Projected ScoreSiena 69
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index53.8
106.4Offensive Efficiency109.2
103.2Defensive Efficiency102.2
3.2Net Efficiency7.0
0.7Strength of Schedule-0.5
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency3.0
64.4Tempo64.4
49.3%Effective FG%50.7%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.8%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
39.5%Free Throw Rate34.9%
2.1Average Margin4.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Siena HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSiena holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–53.7), offensive efficiency (109.2–106.4), defensive efficiency (102.2–103.2), net efficiency (7.0–3.2).
Merrimack COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–-0.5), recent form (12.9–3.0), ball security (14.8–15.8).