
Rider
4-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.5%Rider
94.5%Fairfield
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFairfield -19.2
PROJECTED TOTAL142.8
MODEL MONEYLINEFairfield -1718

Fairfield
21-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 62
Projected Total142.8
Projected ScoreFairfield 81
Team Comparison
29.1MMH Power Index50.1
96.3Offensive Efficiency109.6
115.3Defensive Efficiency105.4
-19.0Net Efficiency4.2
-0.9Strength of Schedule-3.4
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
65.9Tempo67.8
43.4%Effective FG%49.1%
17.1%Turnover Rate15.0%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %36.0%
31.5%Free Throw Rate28.4%
-12.6Average Margin2.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Fairfield HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFairfield holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.1–29.1), offensive efficiency (109.6–96.3), defensive efficiency (105.4–115.3), net efficiency (4.2–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.9–-3.4), free throw rate (31.5–28.4).