Wisconsin logo

Wisconsin

24-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.8%Wisconsin
91.2%Michigan
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMichigan -16.3
PROJECTED TOTAL162.3
MODEL MONEYLINEMichigan -1036
Michigan logo

Michigan

36-3
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWisconsin 73
Projected Total162.3
Projected ScoreMichigan 89

Team Comparison

64.5MMH Power Index80.9
118.6Offensive Efficiency122.3
108.8Defensive Efficiency97.0
9.8Net Efficiency25.3
6.7Strength of Schedule8.7
5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency17.2
69.9Tempo71.8
54.6%Effective FG%58.8%
12.8%Turnover Rate16.4%
28.7%Offensive Rebound %34.6%
32.5%Free Throw Rate38.9%
6.9Average Margin18.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Michigan HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMichigan holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (80.9–64.5), offensive efficiency (122.3–118.6), defensive efficiency (97.0–108.8), net efficiency (25.3–9.8).
Wisconsin COUNTERS WITHball security (12.8–16.4).
Final
Wisconsin logo
Wisconsin
91—88
Michigan logo
Michigan
Wisconsin by 3 • 72.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WisconsinTEAM STATMichigan
29-58FG29-62
50.0%FG%47.0%
15-333PT8-25
45.0%3PT%32.0%
18-23FT22-24
78.0%FT%92.0%
30Rebounds32
8Offensive Rebounds9
16Assists11
10Turnovers9
5Steals1
4Blocks5
18Fouls18

Player Box Score

Wisconsin
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
John BlackwellG399-164-84-653100026
Nick BoydG318-161-25-536110022
Aleksas BieliauskasF316-125-100-030000017
Braeden CarringtonG271-41-49-1294110012
Nolan WinterF363-43-40-03212009
Andrew RohdeG201-31-30-00100003
Jack JanickiG101-30-20-02000002
Will GarlockF40-00-00-00010000
Zach KinzigerG20-00-00-00000000
Michigan
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Elliot CadeauG256-92-45-533000019
Morez Johnson Jr.F306-71-15-642020018
Yaxel LendeborgF314-91-25-562110014
Nimari BurnettG243-82-72-220000010
Roddy Gayle Jr.G274-101-40-02100009
Aday MaraC234-70-01-26102009
Trey McKenneyG152-81-62-21000007
Will TschetterF100-00-02-22000002
L.J. CasonG150-40-10-01200000

Advanced Game Stats

72.2Possessions72.2
126.0Offensive Efficiency121.9
121.9Defensive Efficiency126.0
4.2Net Efficiency-4.2
62.9%Effective FG%53.2%
66.0%True Shooting %59.9%
14.1%Turnover Rate12.3%
39.7%Free Throw Rate38.7%
56.9%3-Point Rate40.3%
1.60Assist / Turnover1.22
Game Summary
Wisconsin won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 72.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.