Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

42.9%Grambling

57.1%Florida A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida A&M -1.6

PROJECTED TOTAL142.5

MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida A&M -133

Florida A&M

14-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 70

Projected Total142.5

Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 72

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricFlorida A&M

41.4MMH Power Index39.4

100.7Offensive Efficiency98.7

100.4Defensive Efficiency105.6

0.3Net Efficiency-6.9

-5.7Strength of Schedule-3.2

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency4.5

69.9Tempo70.6

49.2%Effective FG%49.2%

20.9%Turnover Rate21.6%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %30.5%

42.2%Free Throw Rate38.0%

0.2Average Margin-4.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–39.4), offensive efficiency (100.7–98.7), defensive efficiency (100.4–105.6), net efficiency (0.3–-6.9).

Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-3.2–-5.7), recent form (4.5–-0.4), offensive rebounding (30.5–30.4).

Final

Grambling

84—91

Florida A&M

Florida A&M by 7 • 72.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATFlorida A&M

28-55FG29-53

51.0%FG%55.0%

6-173PT12-30

35.0%3PT%40.0%

22-26FT21-26

85.0%FT%81.0%

24Rebounds28

7Offensive Rebounds10

11Assists13

12Turnovers17

8Steals5

—Blocks—

22Fouls22

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Jamil Muttilib	G	35	9-18	2-8	2-2	4	0	3	22
Derrius Ward	G	40	6-13	2-5	7-8	5	5	1	21
Randarius Jones	C	16	4-6	0-0	2-2	4	1	0	10
Jimel Lane	F	29	2-5	1-1	4-4	1	2	2	9
Rickey Ballard	F	32	2-3	1-2	3-4	1	1	0	8
Antonio Munoz	F	22	2-4	0-0	2-4	2	2	1	6
Devyn Franklin	G	20	2-4	0-1	2-2	1	0	0	6
Saliou Seye	F	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	2
Mekhi Fitts	F	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Florida A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Jaquan Sanders	G	37	7-15	4-11	6-6	3	4	2	24
Micah Octave	G	36	6-11	5-10	3-4	8	1	1	20
Kaleb Washington	F	29	6-9	1-1	5-6	3	1	1	18
Tyler Shirley	F	33	4-6	0-1	6-6	1	4	0	14
Jordan Chatman	G	21	2-6	2-5	1-2	3	2	0	7
Anquan Boldin Jr	G	21	3-3	0-0	0-2	4	1	1	6
Miles Ndalama	C	12	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2
Lenard Taylor Jr.	G	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0
Anthony Knowles	G	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.4Possessions72.4

116.0Offensive Efficiency125.7

125.7Defensive Efficiency116.0

-9.7Net Efficiency9.7

56.4%Effective FG%66.0%

62.4%True Shooting %69.6%

16.6%Turnover Rate23.5%

47.3%Free Throw Rate49.1%

30.9%3-Point Rate56.6%

0.92Assist / Turnover0.76

Game Summary

Florida A&M won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 72.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.