Georgetown logo

Georgetown

13-18
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.9%Georgetown
60.1%Creighton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCreighton -3.6
PROJECTED TOTAL141.3
MODEL MONEYLINECreighton -151
Creighton logo

Creighton

15-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGeorgetown 69
Projected Total141.3
Projected ScoreCreighton 72

Team Comparison

51.5MMH Power Index50.6
107.2Offensive Efficiency109.0
107.4Defensive Efficiency109.5
-0.2Net Efficiency-0.5
4.4Strength of Schedule5.1
-4.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
61.7Tempo68.9
49.2%Effective FG%53.0%
16.4%Turnover Rate16.6%
32.3%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
38.3%Free Throw Rate29.0%
-0.1Average Margin-0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Georgetown HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGeorgetown holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.5–50.6), defensive efficiency (107.4–109.5), net efficiency (-0.2–-0.5), recent form (-4.8–-5.2).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.0–107.2), strength of schedule (5.1–4.4), shooting efficiency (53.0–49.2).
Final
Georgetown logo
Georgetown
83—86
Creighton logo
Creighton
Creighton by 3 • 64.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GeorgetownTEAM STATCreighton
33-58FG32-61
57.0%FG%52.0%
7-163PT13-33
44.0%3PT%39.0%
10-14FT9-11
71.0%FT%82.0%
32Rebounds24
9Offensive Rebounds7
15Assists10
8Turnovers6
3Steals7
1Blocks2
17Fouls14

Player Box Score

Georgetown
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Malik MackG337-101-32-224000017
Julius HalaifonuaC237-110-12-363000016
KJ LewisG385-113-41-263200014
Caleb WilliamsF354-42-22-254000012
Vince IwuchukwuC225-100-21-110010011
Langston LoveG362-51-21-25000006
Jayden FortF101-10-01-23100003
Jeremiah WilliamsG191-40-10-02010002
Kayvaun MulreadyG91-20-10-00000002
Creighton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Austin SwartzG3412-168-121-102110033
Josh DixG426-122-71-231200015
Nik GravesG354-111-44-445100013
Jasen GreenF213-70-20-12100006
Kerem KonanF183-30-00-01000006
Blake HarperG212-31-10-02120005
Isaac TraudtF241-41-40-01000003
Owen FreemanF61-20-01-14001003
Fedor ZugicG140-30-32-21010002
Ty DavisG100-00-00-02000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.5Possessions64.5
128.7Offensive Efficiency133.3
133.3Defensive Efficiency128.7
-4.7Net Efficiency4.7
62.9%Effective FG%63.1%
64.2%True Shooting %64.9%
12.6%Turnover Rate9.2%
24.1%Free Throw Rate18.0%
27.6%3-Point Rate54.1%
1.88Assist / Turnover1.67
Game Summary
Creighton won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 64.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.