
Texas A&M
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
15.6%Texas A&M
84.4%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -11.3
PROJECTED TOTAL154.2
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -541

Tennessee
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 71
Projected Total154.2
Projected ScoreTennessee 83
Team Comparison
58MMH Power Index68.6
116.1Offensive Efficiency115.8
108.4Defensive Efficiency102.1
7.7Net Efficiency13.7
4.8Strength of Schedule7.8
-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
69.1Tempo68.1
53.5%Effective FG%51.6%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.3%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
37.5%Free Throw Rate38.6%
5.3Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY84.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–58.0), defensive efficiency (102.1–108.4), net efficiency (13.7–7.7), strength of schedule (7.8–4.8).
Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.1–115.8), shooting efficiency (53.5–51.6), ball security (14.8–17.3).