
Kentucky
22-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
63.9%Kentucky
36.1%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKentucky -2.4
PROJECTED TOTAL161.2
MODEL MONEYLINEKentucky -177

LSU
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKentucky 82
Projected Total161.2
Projected ScoreLSU 79
Team Comparison
63.9MMH Power Index54.2
115.2Offensive Efficiency115.5
106.3Defensive Efficiency111.3
8.9Net Efficiency4.2
8.7Strength of Schedule4.5
-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.8
69.9Tempo70.5
53.2%Effective FG%53.4%
15.4%Turnover Rate15.6%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
38.0%Free Throw Rate41.9%
6.2Average Margin2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kentucky HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–54.2), defensive efficiency (106.3–111.3), net efficiency (8.9–4.2), strength of schedule (8.7–4.5).
LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.5–115.2), shooting efficiency (53.4–53.2), free throw rate (41.9–38.0).