UCLA logo

UCLA

24-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
85.8%UCLA
14.2%Penn State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -10.1
PROJECTED TOTAL152.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -604
Penn State logo

Penn State

12-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUCLA 81
Projected Total152.8
Projected ScorePenn State 71

Team Comparison

63MMH Power Index42.3
115.9Offensive Efficiency109.2
106.9Defensive Efficiency117.6
9.0Net Efficiency-8.4
5.1Strength of Schedule5.3
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-20.8
66.5Tempo67.5
53.5%Effective FG%53.4%
13.4%Turnover Rate15.6%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %25.6%
33.8%Free Throw Rate34.6%
6.0Average Margin-5.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UCLA HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–42.3), offensive efficiency (115.9–109.2), defensive efficiency (106.9–117.6), net efficiency (9.0–-8.4).
Penn State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.3–5.1), free throw rate (34.6–33.8).
Final
UCLA logo
UCLA
71—60
Penn State logo
Penn State
UCLA by 11 • 60.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UCLATEAM STATPenn State
20-47FG20-46
43.0%FG%43.0%
10-263PT4-22
38.0%3PT%18.0%
21-21FT16-17
100.0%FT%94.0%
32Rebounds21
11Offensive Rebounds6
14Assists12
14Turnovers12
4Steals5
2Blocks1
15Fouls17

Player Box Score

UCLA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Trent PerryG387-134-812-1234200030
Tyler BilodeauF327-134-73-392110021
Steven Jamerson IIF243-30-02-28110008
Eric FreenyG232-32-30-03100006
Jamar BrownG180-20-22-21000002
Eric Dailey Jr.G150-30-32-21000002
Brandon WilliamsG91-30-20-02100002
Donovan DentG290-60-00-00500000
Xavier BookerF120-10-10-04001000
Penn State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dominick StewartG375-121-75-553000016
Eli RiceG285-122-72-200200014
Josh ReedF313-40-06-630100012
Ivan JuricF354-60-11-29110009
Melih TuncaG331-61-42-21311005
Mason BlackwoodF222-40-20-01100004
Freddie Dilione VG80-20-10-01300000
Saša CianiF60-00-00-01100000

Advanced Game Stats

60.1Possessions60.1
118.1Offensive Efficiency99.8
99.8Defensive Efficiency118.1
18.3Net Efficiency-18.3
53.2%Effective FG%47.8%
62.3%True Shooting %55.5%
23.3%Turnover Rate20.0%
44.7%Free Throw Rate37.0%
55.3%3-Point Rate47.8%
1.00Assist / Turnover1.00
Game Summary
UCLA won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 60.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.