
UCLA
24-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
85.8%UCLA
14.2%Penn State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -10.1
PROJECTED TOTAL152.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -604

Penn State
12-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUCLA 81
Projected Total152.8
Projected ScorePenn State 71
Team Comparison
63MMH Power Index42.3
115.9Offensive Efficiency109.2
106.9Defensive Efficiency117.6
9.0Net Efficiency-8.4
5.1Strength of Schedule5.3
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-20.8
66.5Tempo67.5
53.5%Effective FG%53.4%
13.4%Turnover Rate15.6%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %25.6%
33.8%Free Throw Rate34.6%
6.0Average Margin-5.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UCLA HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY85.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–42.3), offensive efficiency (115.9–109.2), defensive efficiency (106.9–117.6), net efficiency (9.0–-8.4).
Penn State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.3–5.1), free throw rate (34.6–33.8).