
Kentucky
22-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.3%Kentucky
73.7%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -7.6
PROJECTED TOTAL154.0
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -280

Tennessee
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKentucky 73
Projected Total154.0
Projected ScoreTennessee 81
Team Comparison
63.9MMH Power Index68.6
115.2Offensive Efficiency115.8
106.3Defensive Efficiency102.1
8.9Net Efficiency13.7
8.7Strength of Schedule7.8
-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
69.9Tempo68.1
53.2%Effective FG%51.6%
15.4%Turnover Rate17.3%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
38.0%Free Throw Rate38.6%
6.2Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–63.9), offensive efficiency (115.8–115.2), defensive efficiency (102.1–106.3), net efficiency (13.7–8.9).
Kentucky COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (8.7–7.8), shooting efficiency (53.2–51.6), ball security (15.4–17.3).