
Bethune-Cookman
17-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
52.6%Bethune-Cookman
47.4%Arkansas-Pine Bluff
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADArkansas-Pine Bluff -0.3
PROJECTED TOTAL158.6
MODEL MONEYLINEBethune-Cookman -111

Arkansas-Pine Bluff
13-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 79
Projected Total158.6
Projected ScoreArkansas-Pine Bluff 79
Team Comparison
44.2MMH Power Index38.7
104.7Offensive Efficiency106.4
106.9Defensive Efficiency111.6
-2.2Net Efficiency-5.2
-3.3Strength of Schedule-6.0
4.0Last 10 Net Efficiency1.3
72.0Tempo72.6
51.9%Effective FG%51.4%
19.2%Turnover Rate18.5%
30.3%Offensive Rebound %29.3%
41.9%Free Throw Rate37.7%
-1.6Average Margin-3.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bethune-Cookman HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY52.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBethune-Cookman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.2–38.7), defensive efficiency (106.9–111.6), net efficiency (-2.2–-5.2), strength of schedule (-3.3–-6.0).
Arkansas-Pine Bluff COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (106.4–104.7), ball security (18.5–19.2).